Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop
De : recscuba_google (at) *nospam* huntzinger.com (-hh)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 06. Jan 2025, 02:00:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vlf9vu$19jiv$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 1/5/25 5:10 PM, Farley Flud wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 15:51:51 -0500, -hh wrote:
 
>
While Feeb is at it, he needs to explain how & why it is significant for
there to be floating point at all, since the input sensor is integer
based:  where is this necessary?  Because without a clear need, it
sounds more like sloppy/lazy programming and/or false features.
>
 Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  What a total ignoramus!
So you couldn't answer the questions.

A base in integers completely sacrifices any fractional portions
thereof, and therein lies the need for floating point representation.
Except that those integers are already a fractionalization representation of color gradients across the three channels (RGB), so just what are you allegedly gaining by when adding even more decimal points which are going to be truncated off?

Check out the global standard, openexr:
 https://openexr.com/en/latest/about.html
Yeah, so what?  Same question still applies: where's the value-added to the configuration that they've chosen?  Do they have a financial interest at hard drive manufacturers for extra storage space?
... No amount of bickering from your ignoramus ass can alter the
reality.
Translation:  Feeb once again snips the questions that he knows that he can't answer.
-hh

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jan 25 * Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop32Farley Flud
5 Jan 25 `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop31DFS
5 Jan 25  `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop30-hh
5 Jan 25   +* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop4Farley Flud
6 Jan 25   i+* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop2-hh
6 Jan 25   ii`- Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop1Farley Flud
6 Jan 25   i`- Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop1DFS
6 Jan 25   `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop25Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jan 25    `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop24-hh
6 Jan 25     `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop23Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jan 25      `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop22-hh
6 Jan 25       `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop21Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Jan 25        `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop20-hh
7 Jan 25         +- Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Jan 25         `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop18Farley Flud
8 Jan 25          `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop17Physfitfreak
8 Jan 25           `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop16Farley Flud
8 Jan 25            `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop15Physfitfreak
8 Jan 25             +- Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop1Physfitfreak
8 Jan 25             `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop13Farley Flud
8 Jan 25              `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop12Physfitfreak
8 Jan 25               `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop11Farley Flud
9 Jan 25                +* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop3Physfitfreak
9 Jan 25                i`* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop2Physfitfreak
9 Jan 25                i `- Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop1Physfitfreak
9 Jan 25                `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop7rbowman
10 Jan 25                 `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop6Physfitfreak
10 Jan 25                  +- Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop1DFS
10 Jan 25                  `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop4Farley Flud
10 Jan 25                   +- Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop1DFS
11 Jan 25                   `* Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop2Physfitfreak
11 Jan 25                    `- Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop1DFS

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal