Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop

On Sun, 05 Jan 2025 20:00:46 -0500, -hh wrote:

 
Except that those integers are already a fractionalization
representation of color gradients across the three channels (RGB), so
just what are you allegedly gaining by when adding even more decimal
points which are going to be truncated off?
 

OMFG!  What an inane attempt at the defense of substandard software!

I hope you are not on Adobe's payroll.  They deserve better.

But there can be no refutation.  The absence of native floating point
support makes Photoshop a highly deficient and substandard product.
It can hardly be suitable for professional scientific image processing.

The case is closed.

No counter argument is possible, unless one is a rambling, deluded,
psychotic.


--
Hail Linux!  Hail FOSS!  Hail Stallman!