Sujet : Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 09. Jan 2025, 01:56:35
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lu8l63Fj3pqU3@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Wed, 08 Jan 2025 22:43:15 +0000, Farley Flud wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:11:00 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:
Linux, by now, should've been and become "really appropriate" for the
unwashed masses.
>
>
Nope. GNU/Linux is not a single organized entity. It is a disjoint
collection of volunteer activity that remarkably, due to its Unix
foundation, holds together quite well.
However, the ongoing problem is the reluctance of hardware manufacturers
either to supply GNU/Linux drivers or to provide open specs for
volunteer developers. For this reluctance, GNU/Linux cannot be blamed.
The GNU/Linux user must always be willing to do the preliminary
compatibility research or else he may be unsatisfied.
GNU/Linux never was intended for the unwashed masses and never will be
for the unwashed masses. Success in this area would actually mean the
destruction of GNU/Linux as a superior OS.
Did you make some sort of New Years resolution about posting well-stated
observations rather than the usual insults? Please keep up the good work.
Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop
Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop