Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes

On 2025-01-09, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

On 2025-01-09 03:52, RonB wrote:

On 2025-01-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

On 2025-01-08 03:45, RonB wrote:

On 2025-01-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

On 2025-01-07 20:05, Joel wrote:

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>

while Windows is the real thing
>
https://www.xvideos.com/video.uekbcub2253/sneaky_big_tits_stepsis_swapped_with_my_sex_doll_tantaly_behind_my_back
>
>
bwa!

>
>
Winblows is fun on suitable hardware, but that's ever-changing.  Linux
will run well on aging hardware, even mine is nicer with it and it's
less than four years old (referring to running Win11, Win10 would
still be fine).

>
Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more responsive
running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on Microsoft's
operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional slowdown and no
fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it by now). In fact,
the Linux experience has been so stellar this time around that I'm
rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.

>
I think Macs can run Linux also. (Although I think you're choices are
limited with the ARM CPU — not sure, though.)

>
I think that there is a distribution being made for the Mx line of
chips, but I have yet to see a Mac running it. Considering the issue
that existed with Yellow Dog Linux back in the PowerPC days, I'm not
surprised that some Mac owners would be reluctant to try it out.

 
Quite a few Mac users are installing Linux on their Intel machines, but
that's because Apple doesn't support them any more. I would imagine that
that time will come with the first ARM Macs at some point. Until then there
probably aren't going to be too many Linux distributions catering to the ARM
Macs.

>
It truly will be sad when the people who own an M1 Mac lose support from
the company. That is a wonderful machine using the first processor that
allowed the company to differentiate itself from the PC line in this
decade. It is fast, it is energy-efficient and it is relatively
inexpensive for anyone interested in owning a computer from them. That
computer should not be thrown into a bin because it's too old; it should
continue to be supported by open-source. At the same time, Apple made it
nearly impossible to change the storage or upgrade the RAM on those
machines, giving the world the impression that they want those machines
to either be thrown out or recycled after half a decade.

It seems like I remember seeing that the newest ARM Macs are reverting back
to upgradeable RAM and SSDs. But I may have misread that.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien