Re: What change of position? YA unsubstantiated claim from luzer-v (was: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1)

-highhorse wrote:
>

(idiocy and lies snipped)

>
You see the garbage that -highhorse will post, to defend the
indefensible, folks?  He's been proven to be wrong, and he's been
caught lying to attack, so this is what we get.
>
He won't concede that government pressure led to censorship on social
media sites, and that that's wrong.
>
Meainwhile, I'm allegedly a "hypocrite" because I've supposedly
"censored" people on USENET.
>
Err...  No I haven't.  I don't have that power.  Choosing to not read
or quote something is not censoring it.  Obviously.
>
What a ridiculous liar, -highhorse is.  What a snit.
>
As for the subject about a "change of position" and "YA
unsubstantiated claim", -highhorse is attacking with pure made-up
snittery.  He wants to blow-up the argument into an unwieldy mess to
distract from the simple points.  This is his usual MO.
>
It's not "unsubstantiated" that -highhorse defended censorship because
it was private companies doing it, even though, we now know, they were
doing it at the behest of the government.
>
Every decent, honest American would admit that what happened was
wrong.  But -highhorse will not admit that happened was wrong.
>
It's also not "unsubstantiated" that -highhorse is a ridiculous liar,
for claiming that cola advocates have "censored" anyone and are thus
"hypocrites".
>
"You're a hypocrite because you complain about tyrants on the left
suppressing our freedoms, but you do it yourself!"
>
Err...  NO, WE DO NOT, YOU RIDICULOUS, LYING ASSHOLE.

-highhorse's snittish response will be deleted, unread.