Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity
De : fsquared (at) *nospam* fsquared.linux (Farley Flud)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 17. Jan 2025, 18:20:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
Message-ID : <181b8a8e6104a26a$11994$2942$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Pan/0.146 (Hic habitat felicitas; d7a48b4 gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan.git)
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 11:39:28 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

 
In LibreOffice, it's just "60". When you apply the "Date" format, the
result is 2/28/00;  or choose the full date format to see the 1900.
>

That's correct for LibreOffice because the LO epoch, or Day 0, is
December 30, 1899.  (Don't ask why.)

But for Microslop Excel, the correct date should be March 1, 1900
because the Excel epoch, or Day 1, is January 1, 1900.

Another superiority of LO Calc is that it handles dates before the
epoch (negative times) all the way back to the year 1582.

Microslop Excel cannot display dates before its epoch.  Total junk!

But the Excel epoch can be changed to 1904 and then can use negative
time, but then this will fuck up a lot of other spreadsheets.

For dates M$ Excel is a total mess.


--
Hail Linux!  Hail FOSS!  Hail Stallman!

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Jan 25 * M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity41Farley Flud
17 Jan 25 +* Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity4Chris Ahlstrom
17 Jan 25 i+- Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity1Farley Flud
17 Jan 25 i`* Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity2-hh
17 Jan 25 i `- Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity1Farley Flud
17 Jan 25 +* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed (was: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity)32Tyrone
17 Jan 25 i+- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed (was: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity)1Farley Flud
18 Jan 25 i`* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed (was: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity)30Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jan 25 i +- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1DFS
18 Jan 25 i `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed28Tyrone
18 Jan 25 i  +* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jan 25 i  i`* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed7Tyrone
18 Jan 25 i  i +- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jan 25 i  i +* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed4Farley Flud
19 Jan 25 i  i i+- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Stéphane CARPENTIER
18 Jan 25 i  i i`* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed2Farley Flud
19 Jan 25 i  i i `- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Physfitfreak
18 Jan 25 i  i `- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Farley Flud
18 Jan 25 i  +* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed4Farley Flud
18 Jan 25 i  i`* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed3Physfitfreak
18 Jan 25 i  i `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed2DFS
19 Jan 25 i  i  `- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jan 25 i  `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed15-hh
18 Jan 25 i   `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed14Tyrone
18 Jan 25 i    +* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jan 25 i    i`* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed11Farley Flud
18 Jan 25 i    i `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed10Physfitfreak
18 Jan 25 i    i  `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed9Farley Flud
18 Jan 25 i    i   +* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed7Physfitfreak
18 Jan 25 i    i   i+- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Physfitfreak
19 Jan 25 i    i   i`* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed5Tyrone
19 Jan 25 i    i   i +- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Physfitfreak
19 Jan 25 i    i   i `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed3rbowman
19 Jan 25 i    i   i  `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed2rbowman
20 Jan 25 i    i   i   `- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1rbowman
19 Jan 25 i    i   `- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Stéphane CARPENTIER
18 Jan 25 i    `- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1-hh
18 Jan 25 +- Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity1DFS
18 Jan 25 `* Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity3Farley Flud
19 Jan 25  `* Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity2Physfitfreak
20 Jan 25   `- Re: PhysFatFuck's Supreme Delusion1DFS

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal