Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity
De : ff (at) *nospam* linux.rocks (Farley Flud)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 17. Jan 2025, 23:05:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
Message-ID : <pan$8fd0e$66c9d449$4f869608$4d53cc04@linux.rocks>
References : 1 2 3
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 15:55:42 -0500, -hh wrote:

On 1/17/25 11:39 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Farley Flud wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
 
Wanna good laugh?
>
Fire up Microcrap Excel.  Open a blank workbook and format
a cell as "Date."  (Accept the default display format.)
>
Now in that same cell enter "60."
>
What do you see?  Answer: “February 29, 1900” (or whatever
display format you have chosen).
>
The problem is that Feb 29, 1900 does not exist!
>
The year 1900 is not a leap year!
>
I'm seeing this right in front of me right now and I am using
the very latest version of Microcrap Excel.
>
OMFG!  What junk!
>
I thank John Walker for this:
>
https://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/calendar/
 
In LibreOffice, it's just "60". When you apply the "Date" format, the
result is 2/28/00;  or choose the full date format to see the 1900.
 
Looking into the Excel bug, it actually appears to be more than merely
that 2/29/1900 doesn't exist:
 
Using a value of 1 ... it reports as being 1/1/1900.  Good enough, but
it also reports that that was a Sunday.  But calendars report that
1/1/1900 was actually a Monday
 
Values 2 thru 59:  same as above: the day of the week is off by one.
 
60:  the Wednesday, 2/29/1900 error
 
61 & higher:  Thursday 3/1/1900 .. so the day of week is now correct.
 
 
-hh

If you read the article that I linked then you will discover
the total bullshit:

"But this is a Microsoft calendar, remember, so one must first look to make
sure it doesn't contain one of those bonehead blunders characteristic of
Microsoft. As is usually the case, one doesn't have to look very far.
If you have a copy of PC Excel, fire it up, format a cell as containing
a date, and type 60 into it: out pops “February 29, 1900”.

"By the time the 1900 blunder was discovered, Excel users had created millions
of spreadsheets containing incorrect day numbers, so Microsoft decided to leave
the error in place rather than force users to convert their spreadsheets,
and the error remains to this day."

It's fucking unbelievable!  To save millions of dummy spreadsheets
Microslop decided to fudge the dates for all users.  Incredible!

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  If this were FOSS there would be an immediate
hostile, and fruitful, reaction.



--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Jan 25 * M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity41Farley Flud
17 Jan 25 +* Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity4Chris Ahlstrom
17 Jan 25 i+- Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity1Farley Flud
17 Jan 25 i`* Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity2-hh
17 Jan 25 i `- Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity1Farley Flud
17 Jan 25 +* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed (was: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity)32Tyrone
17 Jan 25 i+- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed (was: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity)1Farley Flud
18 Jan 25 i`* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed (was: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity)30Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jan 25 i +- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1DFS
18 Jan 25 i `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed28Tyrone
18 Jan 25 i  +* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jan 25 i  i`* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed7Tyrone
18 Jan 25 i  i +- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jan 25 i  i +* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed4Farley Flud
19 Jan 25 i  i i+- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Stéphane CARPENTIER
18 Jan 25 i  i i`* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed2Farley Flud
19 Jan 25 i  i i `- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Physfitfreak
18 Jan 25 i  i `- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Farley Flud
18 Jan 25 i  +* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed4Farley Flud
18 Jan 25 i  i`* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed3Physfitfreak
18 Jan 25 i  i `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed2DFS
19 Jan 25 i  i  `- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jan 25 i  `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed15-hh
18 Jan 25 i   `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed14Tyrone
18 Jan 25 i    +* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jan 25 i    i`* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed11Farley Flud
18 Jan 25 i    i `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed10Physfitfreak
18 Jan 25 i    i  `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed9Farley Flud
18 Jan 25 i    i   +* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed7Physfitfreak
18 Jan 25 i    i   i+- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Physfitfreak
19 Jan 25 i    i   i`* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed5Tyrone
19 Jan 25 i    i   i +- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Physfitfreak
19 Jan 25 i    i   i `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed3rbowman
19 Jan 25 i    i   i  `* Re: MS Excel Working As Designed2rbowman
20 Jan 25 i    i   i   `- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1rbowman
19 Jan 25 i    i   `- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1Stéphane CARPENTIER
18 Jan 25 i    `- Re: MS Excel Working As Designed1-hh
18 Jan 25 +- Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity1DFS
18 Jan 25 `* Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity3Farley Flud
19 Jan 25  `* Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity2Physfitfreak
20 Jan 25   `- Re: PhysFatFuck's Supreme Delusion1DFS

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal