Sujet : Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs
De : guhnoo-basher (at) *nospam* linux.advocaca (DFS)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 20. Jan 2025, 22:39:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmmfpq$3et6v$6@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Betterbird (Windows)
On 1/10/2025 1:59 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2025-01-10 12:43, DFS wrote:
On 1/10/2025 12:37 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
<https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-to-force- install-new-outlook-on-windows-10-pcs-in-february/>
>
Microsoft will force install the new Outlook email client on Windows 10 systems starting with next month's security update.
>
Another nothing burger.
>
Apparently you never noticed the deluge of apps a typical Linux distro forces on you.
Once again, you miss the point: your operating system does not care what you want or don't want because your computer doesn't belong to you.
You're drinking way too much GuhNoo kook-aid lately.
Linux distros don't care what you want or don't want - they put whatever THEY want on it, and you're usually forced to install it. Maybe some pieces can be uninstalled, and maybe not.
The claim that most distros offer 'minimal installations' is totally untrue.
Distrowatch recent ranking
Distro minimal desktop install avail
-------------- -----------------------------
1 Mint no
2 MX Linux yes (Fluxbox only)
3 EndeavourOS yes
4 Debian yes
5 CachyOS no
6 Manjaro no
7 Pop!_OS no
8 Ubuntu no
9 Fedora yes (CoreOS)
10 openSUSE yes (network image)
11 Zorin no
12 Nobara no
13 elementary no
14 KDE neon no
15 antiX yes
And your FOSS computer operating system doesn't belong to you in any way, shape or form. It's permissively licensed, but it's not yours.
Many MS-hater kooks blather on about 'software freedom' and 'you have the source - fix it yourself'. Having the source code is nice, but the extreme difficulty of modifying and re/deploying 3rd party code means you're effectively locked into whatever they give you.
Now what point did I miss?