Re: How To Improve This Group

On 12 Apr 2025 09:34:17 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
 

>
Wrong. Mutt is better.
>

 Mutt is garbage.
 Processing email requires the efficiency that only a GUI
can deliver, and Sylpheed delivers in a lean and mean style.
 

>

It is built on GTK+2 (not +3)

>
Which means: it's bloated.
>

 You got that backwards, idiot.
 GTK+3 is bloated and not GTK+2.
 Sylpheed is a *minimalistic* GUI based on GTK+2 and it beats
every other email client for efficiency and ease of use.
 You are just too stupid to understand.
 

>
It's full of distracting useless shiny
things. When I'm reading an email, I'm expecting to see something to
read, not something to print and to display on my walls.
>

 There is nothing "shiny" about Sylpheed.  It is highly functional
without distraction.  It is perhaps the perfect GUI application.
 Email processing is relatively complex and a terminal cannot
manage without introducing an awkward
 

>
If it can't run on a terminal: it's bloated. Simple and easy.
>

 You are a sorry, idiotic case.
 

>
Mutt was, is and will ever be better.
>

 As I already said, Mutt, compared to Sylpheed, is total garbage.
 Sylpheed is a Japanese product, and its quality is why I only
drive Japanese automobiles.