Sujet : Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop
De : ff (at) *nospam* linux.rocks (Farley Flud)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 08. Jan 2025, 23:43:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
Message-ID : <pan$3a3b$85056c6e$911fe2eb$3ea1376@linux.rocks>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:11:00 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:
Linux, by now, should've been and become "really appropriate" for the
unwashed masses.
>
Nope. GNU/Linux is not a single organized entity. It is a disjoint
collection of volunteer activity that remarkably, due to its Unix
foundation, holds together quite well.
However, the ongoing problem is the reluctance of hardware manufacturers
either to supply GNU/Linux drivers or to provide open specs for volunteer
developers. For this reluctance, GNU/Linux cannot be blamed.
The GNU/Linux user must always be willing to do the preliminary compatibility
research or else he may be unsatisfied.
GNU/Linux never was intended for the unwashed masses and never will be
for the unwashed masses. Success in this area would actually mean the
destruction of GNU/Linux as a superior OS.
-- Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.
Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop
Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop