Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 18:34:22 -0700, Alan wrote:That doesn't even attempt to answer my question.
On 2025-06-03 18:24, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:It is macOS that is “different” from how people expect a “Unix” system to>>
On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 17:14:29 -0700, Alan wrote:
>On 2025-06-03 17:08, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:>>>
When people think “Unix” nowadays, they really mean a Linux or BSD
system. That’s what works they way they expect a “Unix” system to
work. Not Apple.
And yet the folks who run Linux systems are mostly putting GUIs on top
of them.
You get the same choice of GUIs on BSD, pretty much. On Linux and BSD,
the GUI is a modular, replaceable layer. Switching GUIs is as easy as
logging out of one and logging into another. Or you can run with no GUI
at all -- the usual case on servers. You know, those servers that
provide the infrastructure for the entire Internet.
>
Which is not true for Apple’s “Unix”.
So having a choice of GUIs somehow makes the underlying OS components
different?
behave, not the Linuxes and BSDs. Offering a choice of GUIs (or no GUI at
all), is part of how people expect a “Unix” system to behave.
Which is what?As for "infrastructure of the entire Internet"...Precisely my point.
>
...what does it matter if there's a GUI or not on those servers...
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.