Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:And that is completely valid.On 2025-06-04 00:12, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:To the extent that Apple's brand of Unix makes it a much sleeker OSOn Tue, 3 Jun 2025 21:45:14 -0700, Alan wrote:>On 2025-06-03 21:10, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:>>>
It is macOS that is “different” from how people expect a “Unix” system
to behave, not the Linuxes and BSDs. Offering a choice of GUIs (or no
GUI at all), is part of how people expect a “Unix” system to behave.
People's expectations don't define what something is.
That’s how language works. Words mean what they are generally expected to
mean.
And?
>
Just because Apple uses Unix in a different manner doesn't make it into
"not Unix".
than M$'s, I fully endorse that. It's powerful software. The problem
I have with Macs is more the expense. Building a PC to run Linux is
inexpensive, I have two NVMe drives, now, the second one was like $30.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.