Sujet : Re: New WiFi adapter
De : c186282 (at) *nospam* nnada.net (c186282)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy comp.os.linux.miscDate : 04. Jun 2025, 23:58:42
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lZ-cnSnsCsdZUt31nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 6/4/25 4:21 PM, rbowman wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 20:47:08 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
04/06/2025 20:37, rbowman wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 01:14:15 -0400, c186282 wrote:
>
Remember all the great IBM-PC/BIOS routines ?
Made it EASY to write full-screen editors. You had to have the
"Technical Reference Manual" to know all that stuff, however I did
have that ....
>
And everyone felt compelled to write an editor...
>
Fuck that. Wordstar had been available on CP/M for ages, and was better
than vi.
So when it turned up on DOS everyone grabbed a pirate copy. 'joe'
emulates it these days for Linux
>
Definitely. WordStar was bundled on the Osborne 1 CP/M I bought in '81 and
hat is what I used. When I moved to DOS I used Brief which was designed to
be a programming editor.
The 'write an editor' think could be traced to the programming books of
the day. They tended to use string handling in their examples and it
followed 'Oh, I can write an editor'.
I wrote cross-assemblers when they weren't available or expensive but I
was happy with available editors. I did not use vi. Vim (vi improved) is a
hell of an improvement but that was more than 10 years in the future.
vi in most Linux distros is a symlink to Vim so many who claim to use vi
aren't using the original Bill Joy version.
Umm ... are we talking WordSTAR or WordPERFECT here ?
I've used both - indeed even WS on a Kaypro CP/M box -
but WordPerfect was much better. The old boss still
used it for everything until he retired a few years
ago. Fortunately LibreOffice could at least READ WP
files (not sure if ever became able to write them).