Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 22:48:38 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'OliveiroYup!
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <101qig6$13glj$3@dont-email.me>:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 08:41:29 -0700, Alan wrote:Actually, how about you log in to a shell on an Apple system
>On 2025-06-04 00:14, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:>>>
Nobody was disputing that Apple is a licensee of the “Unix” trademark,
and is entitled to use it to label their products.
>
This is why I like to use the term “*nix” with a meaning that has
nothing to do with the trademark, for how a system is supposed to
work. POSIX is a core part of that, of course. But there’s a lot more
to it. Linux and the BSDs conform to this “*nix” concept, while
Apple’s OSes do not.
To which "core parts" do Apple's OSes not conform exactly?
How about you go away and actually use some proper *nix systems for a
few years, then you can come back and show us how you’ve answered the
question for yourself.
and "see for yourself".
It's not only Unix, it's UNIX(r).
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.