Sujet : Re: New WiFi adapter
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy comp.os.linux.miscDate : 05. Jun 2025, 06:50:53
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <macphtF92f9U1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 18:58:42 -0400, c186282 wrote:
On 6/4/25 4:21 PM, rbowman wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 20:47:08 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
04/06/2025 20:37, rbowman wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 01:14:15 -0400, c186282 wrote:
>
Remember all the great IBM-PC/BIOS routines ?
Made it EASY to write full-screen editors. You had to have the
"Technical Reference Manual" to know all that stuff, however I
did have that ....
>
And everyone felt compelled to write an editor...
>
Fuck that. Wordstar had been available on CP/M for ages, and was
better than vi.
So when it turned up on DOS everyone grabbed a pirate copy. 'joe'
emulates it these days for Linux
>
>
Definitely. WordStar was bundled on the Osborne 1 CP/M I bought in '81
and hat is what I used. When I moved to DOS I used Brief which was
designed to be a programming editor.
The 'write an editor' think could be traced to the programming books of
the day. They tended to use string handling in their examples and it
followed 'Oh, I can write an editor'.
I wrote cross-assemblers when they weren't available or expensive but I
was happy with available editors. I did not use vi. Vim (vi improved)
is a hell of an improvement but that was more than 10 years in the
future.
vi in most Linux distros is a symlink to Vim so many who claim to use
vi aren't using the original Bill Joy version.
Umm ... are we talking WordSTAR or WordPERFECT here ?
WordStar. I've never used WordPerfect.