Sujet : Re: “End Of 10” Project
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.comp.os.windows-10Date : 21. Jun 2025, 22:35:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <10378je$19q5v$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 14:19:50 +0100, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
To be fair, I don't think I've ever heard Mr. Torvalds knocking other
OSs ...
From <
https://www.tamos.net/ieee/linus.html>:
What's [sic] do you hate about Windows 95?
Torvalds: What's fundamentally wrong is that nobody ever had any
taste when they did it. Microsoft has been very much into making
the user interface look good, but internally it's just a complete
mess.
What about Windows NT?
Torvalds: NT isn't much better. It tries to be secure and tries to
do things basically the right way, but at the same time NT too
doesn't really have any guiding principles in life.
The only guiding principle is it tries to be more stable than
Windows, which is not saying much. Plus, it tries to make money
which includes running Windows programs. But again, it doesn't
have any core philosophy and because it doesn't have that people
aren't thinking when they do any coding on Windows NT, they aren't
thinking "Is this a really good idea or should I do it some other
way?" because they don't have any guidelines on how things should
be done. So they're just adding things, on top of each other and
hoping that the end result is stable instead of trying to really
build up a very stable base that everybody can depend on.
Prophetic words, don’t you think, considering the interview is from
the last century ...