Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory
De : boraxman (at) *nospam* geidiprime.nospam (Borax Man)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 01. Jul 2025, 12:37:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrn1067i4i.17cq.boraxman@geidiprime.bvh>
References : 1
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2025-07-01, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Some people really cannot let go of the idea that Free Software
projects might be controlled by big corporates out to push their
agenda on the poor, defenceless users (and developers, no doubt).
>
Here’s one case I encountered -- can you spot all the ways he has
mixed up his arguments?
<https://community.asterisk.org/t/cmake-for-a-modern-build-system/108944/7>
>
Conspiracy theorists are never strong on consistency, anyway ...

There does seem to be some political machinations going on, and there
are opinionated people in the Free Software world who do seem to want to
steer things in a particular direction.

However, "Conspiracy Theorists" aren't always wrong, and it pays to be
ahead of the game.

You sound a bit like those who have perfect faith in the market, a
sentiment I don't subscribe to.

Theoretic freedom is different to practical freedom.

The GPL doesn't give a lot of freedom, it is the ability to exercise
choice, and have viable options available that give freedom.  Without
*viable* options, you don't have much freedom, regardless of what is on
paper.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jul02:25 * Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory19Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Jul12:37 `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory18Borax Man
1 Jul23:27  `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory17Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Jul12:35   `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory16Borax Man
3 Jul04:52    `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory15Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Jul12:31     +* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory13Borax Man
3 Jul13:55     i+- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1RonB
4 Jul06:57     i+* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory5Marc Haber
4 Jul08:32     ii`* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jul16:36     ii `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory3vallor
4 Jul19:30     ii  `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory2Lester Thorpe
4 Jul23:28     ii   `- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1vallor
4 Jul08:46     i+- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jul16:26     i`* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory5vallor
4 Jul21:13     i `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory4pothead
4 Jul21:24     i  `* Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory3pothead
4 Jul21:57     i   +- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1pothead
5 Jul02:21     i   `- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1vallor
3 Jul13:54     `- Re: Corporate Conspiracy Open-Source Theory1RonB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal