Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol advocacy |
On 02/07/25 6:14 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:yes it doesAnother alternative to running Windows is to get a Chromebook. TheseExcept for Android app integration, Chrome OS offers no significant
are purpose-built for many business/educational needs, and because
they run on a Linux kernel, there is even the option (officially
provided by Google now, I believe) to put on a regular Linux distro
side-by-side with the locked-down Chrome OS.
>
This review
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/this-lenovo-chromebook-easily-replaced-my-windows-laptop-for-work-and-i-cant-go-back/>
is interesting not just because the title says they are so impressed
they can’t be bothered going back to Windows, but also note that the
laptop in question is running an ARM chip.
>
Now, the claim that this is “the first ARM chip to appear in a
Chromebook” is wrong, I’m pretty sure. I recall some ARM-based
offerings in the early days of ChromeOS, which I think disappeared
because they didn’t (at the time) offer any compelling advantage over
x86-based machines.
>
Note also that this ARM chip is from one of the dozens (hundreds?) of
ARM chip makers that are not Qualcomm. These chips run Linux fine, but
as for Windows-on-ARM, I wouldn’t waste my time.
benefit over a mainstream Linux distribution like Fedora or Mint.
Date | Sujet | # | Auteur | |
2 Jul01:44 | ![]() | 8 | Lawrence D'Oliveiro | |
2 Jul02:14 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | Paul | |
2 Jul03:17 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | Not Necessary | |
2 Jul04:06 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | 3 | % | |
2 Jul04:15 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 2 | Not Necessary | |
2 Jul14:12 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | 1 | % | |
2 Jul04:54 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | rbowman | |
2 Jul19:20 | ![]() ![]() ![]() | 1 | candycanearter07 |
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.