Re: The Chromebook Option

On 02/07/25 8:36 am, % wrote:

Not Necessary wrote:

On 02/07/25 6:14 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

Another alternative to running Windows is to get a Chromebook. These
are purpose-built for many business/educational needs, and because
they run on a Linux kernel, there is even the option (officially
provided by Google now, I believe) to put on a regular Linux distro
side-by-side with the locked-down Chrome OS.
>
This review
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/this-lenovo-chromebook-easily-
replaced-my-windows-laptop-for-work-and-i-cant-go-back/>
is interesting not just because the title says they are so impressed
they can’t be bothered going back to Windows, but also note that the
laptop in question is running an ARM chip.
>
Now, the claim that this is “the first ARM chip to appear in a
Chromebook” is wrong, I’m pretty sure. I recall some ARM-based
offerings in the early days of ChromeOS, which I think disappeared
because they didn’t (at the time) offer any compelling advantage over
x86-based machines.
>
Note also that this ARM chip is from one of the dozens (hundreds?) of
ARM chip makers that are not Qualcomm. These chips run Linux fine, but
as for Windows-on-ARM, I wouldn’t waste my time.

>
Except for Android app integration, Chrome OS offers no significant
benefit over a mainstream Linux distribution like Fedora or Mint.
>

yes it does

How is using browser-only OS, especially one built and locked down by an
advertising company such as Google who openly steals your data is better
than using an open-ended Linux distribution?