Sujet : Re: Distros specifically designed for children
De : mh+usenetspam1118 (at) *nospam* zugschl.us (Marc Haber)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 31. May 2025, 08:04:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : private site, see http://www.zugschlus.de/ for details
Message-ID : <101e9ma$1vrmp$1@news1.tnib.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2025 07:29:48 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
And I still find it better if one just wants a window gone for short
time. Less distance to cover with mouse and eyes (that is VERY relevant
on a big screen) and intuitively at the place where you'd expect it.
>
Have you heard of Fitts’ Law? That is one of the few well-established
numerical laws in UI design: the time it takes to move a pointing device
to a UI element is directly proportional to the square root of how far
away it is, and inversely proportional to its size.
>
This means that a small window-shade element can take longer to click on,
The title bar of a window is bigger than a taskbar icon. And, which
one of the thirty konsole taskbar icons is the window I want gone for
a second?
Please, don't assume that I am stupid, and don't assume I am not aware
of the alternatives. I might only have 25 years of Linux experience,
but I have been around computers way longer than you might think.
even if it is closer than an icon in a taskbar on the edge of the screen,
because the edge of the screen can be reached very fast -- so long as the
taskbar really is right on the edge of the screen, so there is no
possibility of overshoot -- it is effectively of infinite extent in that
direction.
Maybe touching the screen edge triggers a virtual desktop change?
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im HeaderRhein-Neckar, DE | Beginning of Wisdom " | Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402