Re: VMS

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol misc 
Sujet : Re: VMS
De : tnp (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (The Natural Philosopher)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 30. Jun 2025, 08:59:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A little, after lunch
Message-ID : <103tg4t$220b9$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 30/06/2025 08:51, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes:
On 30/06/2025 00:09, c186282 wrote:
These days you CAN 'usually' get away with assuming an
    int is 16 bits - but that won't always turn out well.
>
I thought the default int was 32 bits or 64 bits these days.
ISTR there is a definition of uint16_t somewhere if that is what you want
>
>
A rapid google shows no one talking about a 16 bit int. Today its
reckoned to be 32 bit But if it matters, use int16_t or uint16_t
>
I can find no agreement was to what counts as a short, long, int, at all.
If it matters, use the length specific variable names.
 The language spec guarantees:
   char is at least 8 bits
   short and int are at least 16 bits
   long is at least 32 bits
   long long is at least 64 bits
 There are also some constraints on representation.
 Server/desktop platforms usually have int=32 bits; long is a bit more
variable. It’d probably be 16 bits on a Z80 or similar where memory and
computation are in short supply.
 
I don't remember that at all. Short and int were 16 bits on 8 bit compilers, and long was 32 bits
But it all goes to show that if its in any way important, you should be specific as to how large your variables are.
--
“it should be clear by now to everyone that activist environmentalism (or environmental activism) is becoming a general ideology about humans, about their freedom, about the relationship between the individual and the state, and about the manipulation of people under the guise of a 'noble' idea. It is not an honest pursuit of 'sustainable development,' a matter of elementary environmental protection, or a search for rational mechanisms designed to achieve a healthy environment. Yet things do occur that make you shake your head and remind yourself that you live neither in Joseph Stalin’s Communist era, nor in the Orwellian utopia of 1984.”
Vaclav Klaus

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jun 25 * Re: VMS118Bobbie Sellers
14 Jun 25 +* Re: VMS109Andreas Eder
15 Jun 25 i`* Re: VMS108Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Jun 25 i +* Re: VMS11rbowman
15 Jun 25 i i`* Re: VMS10c186282
15 Jun 25 i i +* Re: VMS5The Natural Philosopher
16 Jun 25 i i i`* Re: VMS4c186282
18 Jun 25 i i i `* Re: VMS3c186282
18 Jun 25 i i i  `* Re: VMS2rbowman
18 Jun 25 i i i   `- Re: VMS1c186282
15 Jun 25 i i `* Re: VMS4rbowman
16 Jun 25 i i  `* Re: VMS3c186282
16 Jun 25 i i   `* Re: VMS2rbowman
16 Jun 25 i i    `- Re: VMS1c186282
15 Jun 25 i `* Re: VMS96c186282
18 Jun 25 i  `* Re: VMS95candycanearter07
18 Jun 25 i   `* Re: VMS94c186282
18 Jun 25 i    +* Re: VMS3candycanearter07
18 Jun 25 i    i`* Re: VMS2Rich
19 Jun 25 i    i `- Re: VMS1rbowman
19 Jun 25 i    `* Re: VMS90Richard Kettlewell
20 Jun 25 i     +* Re: VMS87c186282
20 Jun 25 i     i+* Re: VMS78Richard Kettlewell
20 Jun 25 i     ii+* Re: VMS75The Natural Philosopher
20 Jun 25 i     iii+- Re: VMS1Richard Kettlewell
20 Jun 25 i     iii+* Re: VMS72Rich
20 Jun 25 i     iiii+* Re: VMS66The Natural Philosopher
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii`* Re: VMS65Rich
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii +- Re: VMS1The Natural Philosopher
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii `* Re: VMS63rbowman
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii  `* Re: VMS62Robert Riches
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii   +- Re: VMS1c186282
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii   +- Re: VMS1rbowman
22 Jun 25 i     iiiii   `* Re: VMS59candycanearter07
22 Jun 25 i     iiiii    +* Re: VMS3Richard Kettlewell
22 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i`* Re: VMS2The Natural Philosopher
23 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i `- Re: VMS1c186282
22 Jun 25 i     iiiii    +* Re: VMS3rbowman
23 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i`* Re: VMS2candycanearter07
23 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i `- Re: VMS1rbowman
24 Jun 25 i     iiiii    +* Re: VMS51Robert Riches
24 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i+* Re: VMS6rbowman
24 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii`* Re: VMS5rbowman
24 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii `* Re: VMS4The Natural Philosopher
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii  `* Re: VMS3c186282
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii   `* Re: VMS2The Natural Philosopher
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii    `- Re: VMS1c186282
24 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i+* Re: VMS7Richard Kettlewell
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii`* Re: VMS6Robert Riches
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii `* Re: VMS5c186282
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii  +- Re: VMS1rbowman
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii  `* Re: VMS3John Ames
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii   `* Re: VMS2John Ames
26 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii    `- Re: VMS1c186282
27 Jun07:00 i     iiiii    i`* Re: VMS37candycanearter07
27 Jun08:37 i     iiiii    i `* Re: VMS36Richard Kettlewell
27 Jun08:45 i     iiiii    i  +* Re: VMS4The Natural Philosopher
27 Jun18:27 i     iiiii    i  i`* Re: VMS3c186282
27 Jun19:13 i     iiiii    i  i `* Re: VMS2The Natural Philosopher
28 Jun14:16 i     iiiii    i  i  `- Re: VMS1Chris Ahlstrom
27 Jun18:24 i     iiiii    i  `* Re: VMS31c186282
27 Jun18:40 i     iiiii    i   `* Re: VMS30rbowman
27 Jun19:20 i     iiiii    i    +* Re: VMS4Lew Pitcher
28 Jun00:03 i     iiiii    i    i`* Re: VMS3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Jun06:13 i     iiiii    i    i `* Re: VMS2c186282
28 Jun07:10 i     iiiii    i    i  `- Re: VMS1rbowman
27 Jun23:16 i     iiiii    i    `* Re: VMS25c186282
28 Jun08:52 i     iiiii    i     `* Re: VMS24Richard Kettlewell
29 Jun04:16 i     iiiii    i      `* Re: VMS23c186282
29 Jun08:18 i     iiiii    i       `* Re: VMS22Richard Kettlewell
30 Jun00:09 i     iiiii    i        `* Re: VMS21c186282
30 Jun08:36 i     iiiii    i         +* Re: VMS19The Natural Philosopher
30 Jun08:51 i     iiiii    i         i+* Re: VMS13Richard Kettlewell
30 Jun08:59 i     iiiii    i         ii+* Re: VMS3The Natural Philosopher
30 Jun09:33 i     iiiii    i         iii`* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Jun17:08 i     iiiii    i         iii `- Re: VMS1John Ames
30 Jun09:00 i     iiiii    i         ii+* Re: VMS4Richard Kettlewell
30 Jun09:24 i     iiiii    i         iii`* Re: VMS3The Natural Philosopher
30 Jun09:34 i     iiiii    i         iii `* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Jul04:30 i     iiiii    i         iii  `- Re: VMS1c186282
1 Jul04:26 i     iiiii    i         ii`* Re: VMS5c186282
1 Jul10:49 i     iiiii    i         ii `* Re: VMS4The Natural Philosopher
1 Jul13:44 i     iiiii    i         ii  `* Re: VMS3Lew Pitcher
2 Jul02:46 i     iiiii    i         ii   +- Re: VMS1c186282
2 Jul17:03 i     iiiii    i         ii   `- Re: VMS1Lew Pitcher
30 Jun08:54 i     iiiii    i         i+* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Jun19:10 i     iiiii    i         ii`- Re: VMS1rbowman
1 Jul04:12 i     iiiii    i         i`* Re: VMS3c186282
1 Jul05:02 i     iiiii    i         i `* Re: VMS2rbowman
1 Jul17:42 i     iiiii    i         i  `- Re: VMS1c186282
30 Jun08:56 i     iiiii    i         `- Re: VMS1Richard Kettlewell
27 Jun20:40 i     iiiii    `- Re: VMS1Rich
20 Jun 25 i     iiii`* Re: VMS5Richard Kettlewell
21 Jun 25 i     iiii +* Re: VMS2Rich
21 Jun 25 i     iiii i`- Re: VMS1Richard Kettlewell
21 Jun 25 i     iiii `* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Jun 25 i     iiii  `- Re: VMS1c186282
21 Jun 25 i     iii`- Re: VMS1c186282
21 Jun 25 i     ii`* Re: VMS2c186282
21 Jun 25 i     ii `- Re: VMS1rbowman
20 Jun 25 i     i+* Re: VMS6The Natural Philosopher
20 Jun 25 i     i`* Re: VMS2Rich
20 Jun 25 i     `* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Jun 25 `* Re: VMS8Rich

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal