Sujet : Re: The joy of SQL
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 01. Nov 2024, 04:57:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : wokiesux
Message-ID : <D1GdnVpNqtM5zLn6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 10/31/24 2:20 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 01:35:23 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
On 10/30/24 10:21 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 01:55:35 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>
SQL and flat-file DBs are kind of the all-gobbling monsters.
>
But MV is still the better, saner, way to organize many kinds of
data.
>
The trouble with unnormalized fields is: how do you do updates? You have
to delete all the values and insert them all again.
>
Updates CAN be annoying.
Easy way to remove the annoyance: normalize your field values.
But the 'easy' way removes some of your flexibility
and reasoning ability in the process.
I'd rather do MV, even if updates are a little odd,
than be forced into flat-field fascism.