Re: VMS

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol misc 
Sujet : Re: VMS
De : c186282 (at) *nospam* nnada.net (c186282)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 01. Jul 2025, 04:26:22
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <I1idnXmTyf4eyP71nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 6/30/25 3:51 AM, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes:
On 30/06/2025 00:09, c186282 wrote:
These days you CAN 'usually' get away with assuming an
    int is 16 bits - but that won't always turn out well.
>
I thought the default int was 32 bits or 64 bits these days.
ISTR there is a definition of uint16_t somewhere if that is what you want
>
>
A rapid google shows no one talking about a 16 bit int. Today its
reckoned to be 32 bit But if it matters, use int16_t or uint16_t
>
I can find no agreement was to what counts as a short, long, int, at all.
If it matters, use the length specific variable names.
 The language spec guarantees:
   char is at least 8 bits
   short and int are at least 16 bits
   long is at least 32 bits
   long long is at least 64 bits
 There are also some constraints on representation.
 Server/desktop platforms usually have int=32 bits; long is a bit more
variable. It’d probably be 16 bits on a Z80 or similar where memory and
computation are in short supply.
   Note that "at LEAST 8 bits", "at LEAST 16 bits" is
   just BAD. Making use of modulo, roll-over, can be
   very useful sometimes. If uchars are not 8 bits
   exactly you get unrealized mistakes.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jun 25 * Re: VMS118Bobbie Sellers
14 Jun 25 +* Re: VMS109Andreas Eder
15 Jun 25 i`* Re: VMS108Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Jun 25 i +* Re: VMS11rbowman
15 Jun 25 i i`* Re: VMS10c186282
15 Jun 25 i i +* Re: VMS5The Natural Philosopher
16 Jun 25 i i i`* Re: VMS4c186282
18 Jun 25 i i i `* Re: VMS3c186282
18 Jun 25 i i i  `* Re: VMS2rbowman
18 Jun 25 i i i   `- Re: VMS1c186282
15 Jun 25 i i `* Re: VMS4rbowman
16 Jun 25 i i  `* Re: VMS3c186282
16 Jun 25 i i   `* Re: VMS2rbowman
16 Jun 25 i i    `- Re: VMS1c186282
15 Jun 25 i `* Re: VMS96c186282
18 Jun 25 i  `* Re: VMS95candycanearter07
18 Jun 25 i   `* Re: VMS94c186282
18 Jun 25 i    +* Re: VMS3candycanearter07
18 Jun 25 i    i`* Re: VMS2Rich
19 Jun 25 i    i `- Re: VMS1rbowman
19 Jun 25 i    `* Re: VMS90Richard Kettlewell
20 Jun 25 i     +* Re: VMS87c186282
20 Jun 25 i     i+* Re: VMS78Richard Kettlewell
20 Jun 25 i     ii+* Re: VMS75The Natural Philosopher
20 Jun 25 i     iii+- Re: VMS1Richard Kettlewell
20 Jun 25 i     iii+* Re: VMS72Rich
20 Jun 25 i     iiii+* Re: VMS66The Natural Philosopher
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii`* Re: VMS65Rich
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii +- Re: VMS1The Natural Philosopher
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii `* Re: VMS63rbowman
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii  `* Re: VMS62Robert Riches
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii   +- Re: VMS1c186282
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii   +- Re: VMS1rbowman
22 Jun 25 i     iiiii   `* Re: VMS59candycanearter07
22 Jun 25 i     iiiii    +* Re: VMS3Richard Kettlewell
22 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i`* Re: VMS2The Natural Philosopher
23 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i `- Re: VMS1c186282
22 Jun 25 i     iiiii    +* Re: VMS3rbowman
23 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i`* Re: VMS2candycanearter07
23 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i `- Re: VMS1rbowman
24 Jun 25 i     iiiii    +* Re: VMS51Robert Riches
24 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i+* Re: VMS6rbowman
24 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii`* Re: VMS5rbowman
24 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii `* Re: VMS4The Natural Philosopher
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii  `* Re: VMS3c186282
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii   `* Re: VMS2The Natural Philosopher
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii    `- Re: VMS1c186282
24 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i+* Re: VMS7Richard Kettlewell
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii`* Re: VMS6Robert Riches
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii `* Re: VMS5c186282
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii  +- Re: VMS1rbowman
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii  `* Re: VMS3John Ames
25 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii   `* Re: VMS2John Ames
26 Jun00:01 i     iiiii    ii    `- Re: VMS1c186282
27 Jun07:00 i     iiiii    i`* Re: VMS37candycanearter07
27 Jun08:37 i     iiiii    i `* Re: VMS36Richard Kettlewell
27 Jun08:45 i     iiiii    i  +* Re: VMS4The Natural Philosopher
27 Jun18:27 i     iiiii    i  i`* Re: VMS3c186282
27 Jun19:13 i     iiiii    i  i `* Re: VMS2The Natural Philosopher
28 Jun14:16 i     iiiii    i  i  `- Re: VMS1Chris Ahlstrom
27 Jun18:24 i     iiiii    i  `* Re: VMS31c186282
27 Jun18:40 i     iiiii    i   `* Re: VMS30rbowman
27 Jun19:20 i     iiiii    i    +* Re: VMS4Lew Pitcher
28 Jun00:03 i     iiiii    i    i`* Re: VMS3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Jun06:13 i     iiiii    i    i `* Re: VMS2c186282
28 Jun07:10 i     iiiii    i    i  `- Re: VMS1rbowman
27 Jun23:16 i     iiiii    i    `* Re: VMS25c186282
28 Jun08:52 i     iiiii    i     `* Re: VMS24Richard Kettlewell
29 Jun04:16 i     iiiii    i      `* Re: VMS23c186282
29 Jun08:18 i     iiiii    i       `* Re: VMS22Richard Kettlewell
30 Jun00:09 i     iiiii    i        `* Re: VMS21c186282
30 Jun08:36 i     iiiii    i         +* Re: VMS19The Natural Philosopher
30 Jun08:51 i     iiiii    i         i+* Re: VMS13Richard Kettlewell
30 Jun08:59 i     iiiii    i         ii+* Re: VMS3The Natural Philosopher
30 Jun09:33 i     iiiii    i         iii`* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Jun17:08 i     iiiii    i         iii `- Re: VMS1John Ames
30 Jun09:00 i     iiiii    i         ii+* Re: VMS4Richard Kettlewell
30 Jun09:24 i     iiiii    i         iii`* Re: VMS3The Natural Philosopher
30 Jun09:34 i     iiiii    i         iii `* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Jul04:30 i     iiiii    i         iii  `- Re: VMS1c186282
1 Jul04:26 i     iiiii    i         ii`* Re: VMS5c186282
1 Jul10:49 i     iiiii    i         ii `* Re: VMS4The Natural Philosopher
1 Jul13:44 i     iiiii    i         ii  `* Re: VMS3Lew Pitcher
2 Jul02:46 i     iiiii    i         ii   +- Re: VMS1c186282
2 Jul17:03 i     iiiii    i         ii   `- Re: VMS1Lew Pitcher
30 Jun08:54 i     iiiii    i         i+* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Jun19:10 i     iiiii    i         ii`- Re: VMS1rbowman
1 Jul04:12 i     iiiii    i         i`* Re: VMS3c186282
1 Jul05:02 i     iiiii    i         i `* Re: VMS2rbowman
1 Jul17:42 i     iiiii    i         i  `- Re: VMS1c186282
30 Jun08:56 i     iiiii    i         `- Re: VMS1Richard Kettlewell
27 Jun20:40 i     iiiii    `- Re: VMS1Rich
20 Jun 25 i     iiii`* Re: VMS5Richard Kettlewell
21 Jun 25 i     iiii +* Re: VMS2Rich
21 Jun 25 i     iiii i`- Re: VMS1Richard Kettlewell
21 Jun 25 i     iiii `* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Jun 25 i     iiii  `- Re: VMS1c186282
21 Jun 25 i     iii`- Re: VMS1c186282
21 Jun 25 i     ii`* Re: VMS2c186282
21 Jun 25 i     ii `- Re: VMS1rbowman
20 Jun 25 i     i+* Re: VMS6The Natural Philosopher
20 Jun 25 i     i`* Re: VMS2Rich
20 Jun 25 i     `* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Jun 25 `* Re: VMS8Rich

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal