Sujet : Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 29. Sep 2024, 21:55:59
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lltt6uF4fseU4@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 07:06:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 07:50:14 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
But they didn't. They tried to hack it and it was a disaster.
I hate OO.
But C++ isn’t really OO. It’s a kind of frankenmix of some OO-like
features in with a bunch of other random things.
Part of the problem with C++, at least in the beginning, were the books
claiming to teach the language. C++ has classes; everything has to be a
class. C++ has inheritance; Dog goes 'woof' Cat goes 'meow'.
My edition is old but Stroustrp's book was a lot more restrained than what
most C++ programming books presented.
…