Sujet : Re: VMS
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 27. Jun 2025, 18:40:02
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <mc83bhFcp3sU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 13:24:06 -0400, c186282 wrote:
Some of us are old enough to remember when CPUs were
not always 4/8/16/32/64 ... plus even now they've added a lot of new
types like 128-bit ints. Simply ASSUMING an int is 16 bits is
'usually safe' but not necessarily 'best practice' and limits future
(or past) compatibility. 'C' lets you fly free ...
but that CAN be straight into a window pane
Assuming an int is 16 bits is not a good idea. I wouldn't even assume a
short is 16 bits
Re: VMS
Re: VMS