Sujet : Re: The joy of SQL
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 03. Nov 2024, 02:51:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : wokiesux
Message-ID : <uX2dnRqXzJuwSrv6nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 11/2/24 8:15 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 03:21:40 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
IMHO, MV is still the 'best', 'most logical', 'most compact'.
Except when you need to do updates.
As said, that's NOT as complex or resource-consuming
as you believe. Maintaining a 'data dictionary', a
guide to the exact structure of each DB, removes
possible ambiguities.
Anyhow ...
https://www.predictiveanalyticstoday.com/top-free-commercial-multivalue-database/
…