Sujet : Re: I never thought of this scenario
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 23. Apr 2024, 03:23:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v072io$18h5n$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 13:26:15 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 20/04/2024 01:24, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
Thank you for admitting what some other parties still refuse to say.
I habvent admitted anything .
Then you need to retract the incriminating phrase: “need to be told to
route DHCP *in some way*”. The fact that routers “need to be told” is what
makes it “special”. Routable protocols don’t need this “special
treatment”. Routers carry them as a matter of course.
So go on, deny that routers “need to be told” anything about DHCP in
particular.
A router *is* "a special tunnelling mechanism", not part of the actual
protocol" for IP. And its NOT tunnelling.
So a “special tunnelling mechanism” is NOT tunnelling? Keep on tying
yourself in knots ...