Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol misc |
On 12/05/2024 20:42, D wrote:This is true. I always found that holding on to my winners, while getting rid of everything else has been an excellent investment maxim.On Sun, 12 May 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:>I invested in nuclear around 2006 when it was clear that there was no other alternative to it, and lost a little.Well Rolls Rocce fell though the floor in COVID as no one was flying,m but now they are and so are the shares. They are also trying to get a small nuclear reactor design approved.Will look into it. Generally, nuclear would seem like the logical choice, but there's still a lot of opposition to it from the deep state, so it could take decades before an investment blossoms.
It takes around 15-25 years for the 'exhausting every other alternative' bit to happen.
I think we have another 5 years of renewable crap to live through before someone like Bill Gates builds a small reactor and suddenly they are 'what everybody uses'
>
You don't have to be concerned about climate change to realise we are running out of *cheap* fossil fuel, at least in Europe, and the drive to renewables plus bigging up climate change as a *moral* issue reflects a typical ArtStudent™ response to that.
>
>I did look at a swedish nuclear power services company, but they were already fairly highly valuated, due to the EU acknowledgeing nuclear as green energy I suspect.>
I shied away from ARM years ago when someone pointed out that their valuation required 'every household to own half a dozen microcontrollers'.
>
What with smart phones TVS and cars, today they do...
>
My strategy is simple. Put a few in my portfolio, and if they start to climb, buy more. |If they don't, sell them.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.