Sujet : Re: evolution of bytes, The joy of FORTRAN
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 01. Mar 2025, 03:43:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vpts86$3ud2o$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:51:40 -0700, Peter Flass wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>
[Little-endian] just makes more sense.
A lot of older machines were character-addressable. The term “byte”
hadn’t been invented yet. The 1401 (etc), 1620, and many 70xx machines.
The 1401 and 1620 were effectively little-endian, too. I don’t think any
of those other pre-System/360 machines offered both long (multicharacter)
word lengths and character addressability.
The initial meaning of “byte” was actually “bitfield”.