Re: The joy of FORTRAN

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol misc 
Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : c186282 (at) *nospam* nnada.net (c186282)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 09. Mar 2025, 06:20:19
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <k6WcnceGQYGFuFD6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 3/8/25 5:13 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 08/03/2025 20:37, rbowman wrote:
On Sat, 08 Mar 2025 14:42:42 GMT, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>
rbowman <bowman@montana.com> writes:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 00:21:15 -0500, c186282 wrote:
>
Relay logic was sort of fun. You were building state machines with
relays,
Eagle Signal electro-mechanical timers, limit switches, and so forth. I
never did it but even more fascinating were some of the complex machines
that were all cams, levers, gears, and springs except for the drive
motor.
>
I use and repair relay logic even in these digital times:
>
https://pinside.com/pinball/machine/target-pool
>
Real solenoids, lacing twine, DCC wire, and multi-contact steppers! The
past lives on.
 I knew a guy once who was building a working 18th century stage coach for a museum. Ultra lightweight ash body etc.
 I guess whatever turns you on...
   Well, if civ falls down (again) we'll want and need
   Ye Olde Tech !
   So, keep it alive.
   If I were suddenly transported back to the 9th century,
   telegraph tech WOULD be ultra-valuable. The first real
   'electronic' thing easiest to make would be a shitty,
   but functional, vacuum-tube/valve. Radio would warn of
   the incipient Norman Conquest !!!
   There's a huge tome called the "ARRL Radio Amateur's
   Handbook" (sometimes several small tomes) that cover
   just EVERYTHING that is or ever was in comm tech -
   from iron-filing 'detectors' and mechanical sine-wave
   generators on up. Had one, lost it somewhere, very sad.
   Vast practical knowledge between those covers.
 https://www.amazon.com/ARRL-Handbook-Radio-Communications-101st/dp/1625952074
   I think the somewhat older ones were more comprehensive on
   the older tech.
   In the 9th century, would you know how to make a low-vac
   'valve' using existing/near tech ??? A 250khz radio set ?
   Kind of a sci-fi exercise now ... UNTIL civ falls (again).
   Clue ... pre-fill the envelope with carbon monoxide, easy
   enough to make. It's a reducer, will want to scavenge any
   excess oxygen. A bit of iron 'sponge' at the bottom of
   the tube. Suck as dry as possible then pre-heat to a few
   hundred and let bake for a week or two. Not a perfect
   vac, but perhaps Good Enough for some practical work
   at lower frequencies.
   Imagine you'd been deep-frozen for 2500 years only to
   awake and find everything back to sticks and stones
   and chopping-up enemies with axes. Your greatest value
   would be in sneaky comm tech, instant reports from spies
   and field commanders. "MAGIC" !
   Hey, civ CAN fall again - now helped-on by nukes and/or
   the disaster of globally-interdependent economics. I think
   they've managed to revive frozen dogs. So, the whole
   proposed scene is NOT entirely impossible anymore. A bit
   Verne-ian cutting edge, but not impossible. 25 years,
   even less impossible.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Feb 25 * Re: The joy of FORTRAN567vjp2.at
25 Feb 25 +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN378Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Feb 25 i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN377Peter Flass
25 Feb 25 i +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN369John Ames
25 Feb 25 i i+* Re: The joy of FORTRAN236John Ames
25 Feb 25 i ii+* Re: The joy of FORTRAN225Peter Flass
26 Feb 25 i iii`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN224Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Feb 25 i iii +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN219John Ames
26 Feb 25 i iii i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN218Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Feb 25 i iii i +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1John Ames
27 Feb 25 i iii i `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN216Rich Alderson
27 Feb 25 i iii i  +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Feb 25 i iii i  i`- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1Rich Alderson
27 Feb 25 i iii i  `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN213John Ames
27 Feb 25 i iii i   +* Re: the end of 18 bits, The joy of FORTRAN6John Levine
27 Feb 25 i iii i   i+- Re: the end of 18 bits, The joy of FORTRAN1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Feb 25 i iii i   i+* Re: the end of 18 bits, The joy of FORTRAN2John Levine
28 Feb 25 i iii i   ii`- Re: the end of 18 bits, The joy of FORTRAN1John Levine
28 Feb 25 i iii i   i`* Re: the end of 18 bits, The joy of FORTRAN2Chris Ahlstrom
1 Mar 25 i iii i   i `- Re: the end of 18 bits, The joy of FORTRAN1c186282
7 Mar 25 i iii i   `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN206Alfred Falk
7 Mar 25 i iii i    `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN205Dan Cross
7 Mar 25 i iii i     +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1Lynn Wheeler
7 Mar 25 i iii i     `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN203rbowman
8 Mar 25 i iii i      +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN3Dan Cross
8 Mar 25 i iii i      i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN2ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
8 Mar 25 i iii i      i `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1rbowman
8 Mar 25 i iii i      `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN199c186282
8 Mar 25 i iii i       `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN198rbowman
8 Mar 25 i iii i        +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN75rbowman
8 Mar 25 i iii i        i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN74The Natural Philosopher
9 Mar 25 i iii i        i `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN73c186282
9 Mar 25 i iii i        i  `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN72rbowman
9 Mar 25 i iii i        i   +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN67c186282
9 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i+* Re: The joy of FORTRAN16rbowman
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   ii`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN15c186282
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   ii `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN14rbowman
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   ii  +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN7Sn!pe
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   ii  i+* Re: The joy of FORTRAN5rbowman
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   ii  ii+* Re: The joy of FORTRAN3Sn!pe
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   ii  iii`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN2rbowman
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   ii  iii `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1c186282
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   ii  ii`- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1c186282
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   ii  i`- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1c186282
11 Mar 25 i iii i        i   ii  `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN6c186282
11 Mar 25 i iii i        i   ii   +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1The Natural Philosopher
11 Mar 25 i iii i        i   ii   `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN4rbowman
13 Mar 25 i iii i        i   ii    `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN3c186282
13 Mar 25 i iii i        i   ii     `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN2rbowman
13 Mar 25 i iii i        i   ii      `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1c186282
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN50Rich Alderson
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN10c186282
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i+* Re: The joy of FORTRAN8rbowman
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i ii+- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1rbowman
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i ii`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN6c186282
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i ii +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN2John Ames
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i ii i`- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1rbowman
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i ii `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN3rbowman
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i ii  `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN2Dan Cross
13 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i ii   `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1c186282
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i`- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN33rbowman
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN32The Natural Philosopher
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN16rbowman
11 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i i+* Re: The joy of FORTRAN13The Natural Philosopher
11 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i ii+* Re: The joy of FORTRAN3rbowman
11 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i iii`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN2The Natural Philosopher
11 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i iii `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1David LaRue
11 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i ii+- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1The Natural Philosopher
11 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i ii+- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i ii+* Re: The joy of FORTRAN4rbowman
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i iii+- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1c186282
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i iii`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN2The Natural Philosopher
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i iii `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1The Natural Philosopher
13 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i ii`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN3c186282
13 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i ii `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN2The Natural Philosopher
14 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i ii  `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1c186282
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN2c186282
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i i `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1The Natural Philosopher
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN15c186282
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i  `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN14The Natural Philosopher
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i   +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1The Natural Philosopher
13 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i   `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN12rbowman
13 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i    +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1rbowman
13 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i    +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1rbowman
14 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i    +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN6Don_from_AZ
14 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i    i+* Re: The joy of FORTRAN2ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
14 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i    ii`- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1c186282
14 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i    i+* Re: The joy of FORTRAN2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i    ii`- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1c186282
14 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i    i`- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1c186282
15 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i    `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN3Peter Flass
15 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i     +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1rbowman
16 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i i     `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1c186282
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN6Don_from_AZ
10 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i  +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i  i`- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1c186282
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i  `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN3c186282
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i   `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN2The Natural Philosopher
12 Mar 25 i iii i        i   i    `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1rbowman
9 Mar 25 i iii i        i   `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN4Kerr-Mudd, John
8 Mar 25 i iii i        +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN27Dan Espen
9 Mar 25 i iii i        +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN9c186282
9 Mar 25 i iii i        `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN86c186282
26 Feb 25 i iii +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN3rbowman
27 Feb 25 i iii `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1Rich Alderson
25 Feb 25 i ii+- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1Peter Flass
26 Feb 25 i ii+* Re: The joy of FORTRAN7Rich
26 Feb 25 i ii`* Re: The joy of old small computers, which sort of ran FORTRAN2John Levine
25 Feb 25 i i+* Re: The joy of FORTRAN101Peter Flass
26 Feb 25 i i+* Re: The joy of FORTRAN27John Levine
26 Feb 25 i i+* Re: The joy of FORTRAN3c186282
28 Feb 25 i i`- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1c186282
25 Feb 25 i +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN4Bob Eager
25 Feb 25 i `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Feb 25 `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN188c186282

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal