Re: Anybody Using IPv6?

On 17 May 2025 18:01:35 GMT, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

On Thu, 15 May 2025 18:42:47 +0000, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote in
<pan$e6d88$f019cb49$2e3cccf9$253bfbf1@linux.rocks>:
>

GNU/Linux has total IPv6 capabilities but this is also fully
configurable.
 
Since I operate a standalone workstation that is only connected to the
Internet via Comcast, my system and software configuration only includes
IPv4.  (My local network certainly does not require it.)
 
IOW, I don't need IPv6 and therefore I exclude it.
 
Does anybody use or need IPv6?
 
I suppose that since the vast majority of GNU/Linux users depend on a
distro and that since most distros automatically enable IPv6 the answer
is that most users have IPv6 enabled whether they need it or not.

>
(It's considered good netiquette to announce a followup-to when
crossposting.  Please consider doing that in the future.)

I didn't notice the OP had set a follow up to COLA. Had I
noticed I wouldn't have replied....
COLA is Troll-Land.
[]'s

>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
$ ping -c 1 news.eternal-september.org
PING news.eternal-september.org (2a01:4f9:4b:44c2::2) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from news.eternal-september.org (2a01:4f9:4b:44c2::2): icmp_seq=1
ttl=47 time=174 ms
>
--- news.eternal-september.org ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 174.342/174.342/174.342/0.000 ms
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
IPv6 is the future.  I think more and more people are using it,
since their equipment and clients "just work" with it.
>
(There is a learning curve, though -- but there was with IPv4 too.)

--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021