Re: Anybody Using IPv6?

c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:

  IPV4 = unexpectedly proved a bit inadequate

totally inadequate.

  IPV6 = horrible overkill 'solution'

I violently disagree.

It is IPv4 that needs overkill 'solutions' to be kept alive.

  IPV5 ... my proposal ... maybe the best and
  most transparent. Good for the next 50 years
  fer-sure.

Horrible.

  These are numbers HUMANS can read, remember, understand.

IP Adresses were never meant to be remembered or understood.

  Don't know WHERE the IPV6 stuff was coming from - TOO tech
  IMHO.

It is a sane, nicely designed, simple protocol with a lot of
flexibility that needs less worarounds that IPv4 does.

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Rhein-Neckar, DE   |     Beginning of Wisdom "     |
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402