Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol misc |
On 5/20/25 5:37 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:And have our children go over this problem again?On 20/05/2025 08:59, Marc Haber wrote:Hey, it'd WORK - kinda smoothly.Popping Mad <rainbow@colition.gov> wrote:Well it is another apparent 'designed by comp scis to be as opaque as possible with a hundred bells and whistles that no one will ever use'On 5/17/25 2:01 PM, vallor wrote:>IPv6 is the future.>
fuck ip6
This is a raging example how pseudonymous people say things that would
be unwise to say in a non-anonymous environment.
>
IPv6 is a protocol. It is a good one. It doesn't hurt anybody. Why
should it be "fucked"?
>
I think that this kind of hate should go a different way.
>
>
As c186282 said. why not just prepend or append another '.000.'
Backwards compatibility kinda easy.
Also, the NUMBERS are things people can UNDERSTAND,
unlike all the long HEX crap in IPV6
IPV4 = unexpectedly proved a bit inadequate
IPV6 = horrible overkill 'solution'
IPV5 ... my proposal ... maybe the best and
most transparent. Good for the next 50 years
fer-sure.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.