Sujet : Re: Distros specifically designed for children
De : c186282 (at) *nospam* nnada.net (c186282)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 30. May 2025, 04:52:23
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <hticnY87ptDltqT1nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 5/29/25 6:43 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 08:58:11 -0700, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
On 5/28/25 21:24, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
So what were the problems with systemd, exactly?
>
Instability.
When Debian Unstable adopted it, I didn’t even notice the transition.
That’s how stable it was.
What kind of instability did you run into?
You're right - almost NO "instability", even
early on.
They DO keep EXPANDING systemd though ... evil
MIGHT infiltrate.
If you're paranoid then DON'T USE IT. There are
several kinds of servers where you maybe should
not use it.
The TRICK is for distos to make it EASY to use,
or NOT use, systemd. "MX" has explicit boot
options - use or don't. Grub Customizer lets
you pick which option starts preferably. This
is good, the RIGHT way - no fascism.