Sujet : Re: Distros specifically designed for children
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 30. May 2025, 23:30:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <101dbhc$mkpm$9@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:40:57 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
My beef was mainly that it enforced the need for EVERY SINGLE DAEMON to
have its config file rewritten in a more complex form.
systemd had extensive backward compatibility with sysvinit scripts right
from the beginning. Otherwise nobody would have bothered with a transition
that would have been more painful than it needed to be.
This could be one of the reasons that systemd became so popular, because
it did a better job of sysvinit compatibility than some of the other
service-management alternatives.
And this in spite of the fact that systemd unit files are usually a model
of simplicity and clarity, compared to the usual boilerplate-ridden
sysvinit scripts.