Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ol misc |
On 2025-05-29, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:>Proprietary software does matter. Many people use it.
The only “software authors and vendors” I have heard complain about
the variety of Linux distros are the ones hawking proprietary
products. The ones who do Free Software don’t have to worry, since
it’s not their problem: it’s up to the respective distro
maintainers to make the software available in the relevant
packaging system.
>
Also, if the distro maintainers don't package your software, you
either do it yourself, or leave it as an exercise to the user, which
you cannot assume the user would know how to do it.
>Likewise with configuration. Having set up Linux systems for>
others, and servers, subtle differences become blockers when
Distro X modifies the base software and the instructions, for a
different distro don't quite work. These are not insurmountable,
but pain points which increase cost.
Never come across any such “pain points”. Feel free to point some out.
Setting up Apache with MariaDB, subtle differences in configuration
mean that the instructions you find online may not work, because
another distro has different default passwords, or sets a default
password where another might not.
Also differences in system services, how they are configured.
>Linux could have gone this way, if there the first distro was the>
sole distro for several years and gained mindshare as THE Linux.
Do you think somebody should step in and force an end to all this
freedom? How would they go about it, do you think? Would moving to
proprietary licences help?
No, I don't think there is much that can be done now. It is what it
is.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.