Sujet : Re: Distros specifically designed for children
De : not (at) *nospam* telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 31. May 2025, 03:27:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net
Message-ID : <683a690e@news.ausics.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : tin/2.0.1-20111224 ("Achenvoir") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.31 (i586))
Borax Man <
rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote:
X11 has issues, but it works, and has powered Unix GUI's for decades.
I find it useful, and if it is inefficient, it hasn't been that much of
an issue.
It's efficient enough to run fine on the Pentium 1 PC I'm posting
from now.
Likewise, I'll be happy to go to Wayland, when doing so is almost
seamless.
As of now, I think I could use it, but all the DE's/window Managers that
I would want to use are X11.
Almost all the graphical programs I use regularly don't support
Wayland because they either use an old graphics toolkit that
doesn't support it (GTK2, Motif) or don't use a graphics toolkit
at all and link directly to xlib. So even if I saw a reason to
switch, I'd have to change most of the software I use (likely to
slower alternatives) or I'd be running everything in XWayland
anyway.
Luckily I don't do graphics intensive stuff so if people stop
writing GPU drivers for X it won't affect me, and I can do the
work of building it myself (with patches if required) if distros
stop packaging it.
-- __ __#_ < |\| |< _#