Sujet : Re: Distros specifically designed for children
De : not (at) *nospam* telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 31. May 2025, 04:49:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net
Message-ID : <683a7c3c@news.ausics.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : tin/2.0.1-20111224 ("Achenvoir") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.31 (i586))
c186282 <
c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
On 5/30/25 10:46 PM, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
If you're rewriting every single daemon yourself then you probably
would get pretty good at it by the end. But if you're just
adding/debugging things once in a while like a normal person it's
a minefield compared to relatively self-descriptive (if you
understand shell scripting at least) init scripts.
Systemd is not "perfect" - but neither was SysV.
I see them as "complementary", not enemies.
True, prophecies of Systemd avoidance becoming impossible within a
few years have proven unfounded, so no real need to worry about the
existance of the other option.
-- __ __#_ < |\| |< _#