Sujet : Re: Distros specifically designed for children
De : tnp (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (The Natural Philosopher)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 04. Jun 2025, 12:01:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A little, after lunch
Message-ID : <101p922$ojp1$17@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 04/06/2025 05:23, rbowman wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 18:32:53 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
Or they re-define "ergonomic" to mean whatever their shit is this week.
My favorite word. I've driven everything from AH Sprites to Kenworth
diesels and the most uncomfortable car I ever drove was an ergonomically
designed Audi. They used someone else's ergos. After we split my ex traded
it for a Rabbit and I thought that was a step upward. Audi has come a long
ways since the early '70s.
Then there are ergonomic mice. Great, I guess, if you're a right handed
herd creature. I'm too cheap to have ever bought one of those Star Wars
ergonomic keyboards so I can't address them.
REAL ergonomics is supported by testing.
It has been shown that people can read - e.g. - an analogue dial and pointer alitmeter in about 1/3rd the time they can read a digital display. So aircraft have those. They can find a knob or switch by feel, but not a touch screen, so aircraft have physical knobs and switches.
Consumer 'ergonomics' consists in making it look attractive. So silly people will *buy* it.
It doesn't have to actually work, in fact if it doesn't they will be back next year for the newer model ...
-- “It is not the truth of Marxism that explains the willingness of intellectuals to believe it, but the power that it confers on intellectuals, in their attempts to control the world. And since...it is futile to reason someone out of a thing that he was not reasoned into, we can conclude that Marxism owes its remarkable power to survive every criticism to the fact that it is not a truth-directed but a power-directed system of thought.”Sir Roger Scruton