Sujet : Re: Distros specifically designed for children
De : sc (at) *nospam* fiat-linux.fr (Stéphane CARPENTIER)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 06. Jun 2025, 19:33:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Mulots' Killer
Message-ID : <6843345d$0$16823$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Le 03-06-2025, Rich <
rich@example.invalid> a écrit :
>
The statement I saw wasn't saying that systemd interfered. It was
asserting that Wayland itself at some low level enforced the MS Win
method of:
>
"giving keyboard focus causes a raise to the top of the window"
>
and
>
"only the window on top of the stack is allowed to have keyboard focus"
>
And thereby stating that when 'wayland' arrived, one would be forced
into the MSWin mindset of "only top most window in stack can have
keyboard focus".
>
As I said at the outset, I've long ago lost the reference to where I
saw this comment, so I can't refer to the source.
I don't know which reference it is but it's just plain stupid. It's
probably someone like FF/DG/FR/whatever who hates what he doesn't know.
Because there is no link between switching from X11 to wayland and
having a computer used in a Windows way. For example, the difference
between i3 and sway is the switch from X11 by the former to wayland by
the later. And the switch don't like more like a Windows way to use one
computer.
-- Si vous avez du temps à perdre :https://scarpet42.gitlab.io