Sujet : Re: New WiFi adapter
De : rich (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Rich)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 07. Jun 2025, 03:42:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <10208uu$2lc3b$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64))
The Natural Philosopher <
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 06/06/2025 22:08, Andreas Eder wrote:
On Fr 06 Jun 2025 at 18:48, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
Le 04-06-2025, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> a écrit :
On 04/06/2025 20:37, rbowman wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 01:14:15 -0400, c186282 wrote:
>
Remember all the great IBM-PC/BIOS routines ?
Made it EASY to write full-screen editors. You had to have the
"Technical Reference Manual" to know all that stuff, however I did
have that ....
>
And everyone felt compelled to write an editor...
>
Fuck that. Wordstar had been available on CP/M for ages, and was better
than vi.
So when it turned up on DOS everyone grabbed a pirate copy. 'joe'
emulates it these days for Linux
>
I don't know about the difference between wordstar and vi ages ago. I
have always used vim. Last time I checked joe is nowhere close to vim.
joe can emulate Wordstar.
That's what I said.
You may say that Wordstar doesn't have all the regex extensions that VI
had, but remember, when your output device is a teleprinter you really
NEED those.
Wordstar assumes an 80x25 character screen.
Depends upon which version is your reference point. WordStar 7 for DOS
(the last DOS version, by the way) will use larger than 80x25 character
screens. I used it (WS7) for a good many years running (IIRC) in 80x50
character mode, first under DesqView on top of DOS plus QEMM386 then
later in Dosemu on Linux.
I don't recall ever testing it with more than 80 columns, but as it
worked just fine with 50 lines I presume it would have worked with more
than 80 columns.