Sujet : Re: Another Ridiculous Cable Problem
De : nuh-uh (at) *nospam* nope.com (Alan)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy comp.os.linux.miscDate : 23. Jun 2025, 20:22:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103c9ho$1enkg$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2025-06-21 11:59, Farley Flud wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 01:04:34 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>
Never seen one yet.
>
You haven't stripped enough cables.
>
But there is a reason why aluminium is avoided at all costs
>
Did you ever hear of Copper Coated Aluminum?
Many consumer "budget" cables use this material. As I said,
the bean counters always trump the engineers.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper-clad_aluminium_wire>
Odd that your chosen reference makes no mention of the thing you claim, huh?
Re: Another Ridiculous Cable Problem
Re: Another Ridiculous Cable Problem