Re: VMS

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ol misc 
Sujet : Re: VMS
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 01. Jul 2025, 05:02:55
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <mch4veFs6a9U2@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 23:12:21 -0400, c186282 wrote:

   MOST compilers, I think ints are still almost always 16-bits as a
   holdover from the good old days. You can declare long and long long
   ints of course, but int alone, expect it to be 16-bit.

Not any compiler I've worked with in the last few decades. That sort of
went out with CP/M.  Way back when bytes were worth their weight in gold
someone declared 'short  ObjNum;'  That's rather important since that is
the number of objects that can be handled by the system including
incidents, comments, persons, vehicles, alerts and so forth. Being signed
and 16 bits the maximum value is 32767

It got by for an amazingly long time but as larger, busier sites came
along the system ran out of object number. It wasn't pretty.

Edit a number of files to make it an unsigned short and you get 65535. It
was close a couple of times but with some sophisticated reuse strategies
there never was a disaster.

Why not make it an int? Even with a signed int 2147483647 wouldn't be a
problem. Because an int is 32 bits.  Every struct, every XDR encoding,
database, and so forth would have to be modified so we crossed our
fingers. In DB2 SMALLINT is 16 bits, INT is 32 bits. SQL Server is the
same. Both of them use BIGINT for 64 bits.




Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jun 25 * Re: VMS116Bobbie Sellers
14 Jun 25 +* Re: VMS107Andreas Eder
15 Jun 25 i`* Re: VMS106Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Jun 25 i +* Re: VMS11rbowman
15 Jun 25 i i`* Re: VMS10c186282
15 Jun 25 i i +* Re: VMS5The Natural Philosopher
16 Jun 25 i i i`* Re: VMS4c186282
18 Jun 25 i i i `* Re: VMS3c186282
18 Jun 25 i i i  `* Re: VMS2rbowman
18 Jun 25 i i i   `- Re: VMS1c186282
15 Jun 25 i i `* Re: VMS4rbowman
16 Jun 25 i i  `* Re: VMS3c186282
16 Jun 25 i i   `* Re: VMS2rbowman
16 Jun 25 i i    `- Re: VMS1c186282
15 Jun 25 i `* Re: VMS94c186282
18 Jun 25 i  `* Re: VMS93candycanearter07
18 Jun 25 i   `* Re: VMS92c186282
18 Jun 25 i    +* Re: VMS3candycanearter07
18 Jun 25 i    i`* Re: VMS2Rich
19 Jun 25 i    i `- Re: VMS1rbowman
19 Jun 25 i    `* Re: VMS88Richard Kettlewell
20 Jun 25 i     +* Re: VMS85c186282
20 Jun 25 i     i+* Re: VMS76Richard Kettlewell
20 Jun 25 i     ii+* Re: VMS73The Natural Philosopher
20 Jun 25 i     iii+- Re: VMS1Richard Kettlewell
20 Jun 25 i     iii+* Re: VMS70Rich
20 Jun 25 i     iiii+* Re: VMS64The Natural Philosopher
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii`* Re: VMS63Rich
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii +- Re: VMS1The Natural Philosopher
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii `* Re: VMS61rbowman
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii  `* Re: VMS60Robert Riches
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii   +- Re: VMS1c186282
21 Jun 25 i     iiiii   +- Re: VMS1rbowman
22 Jun 25 i     iiiii   `* Re: VMS57candycanearter07
22 Jun 25 i     iiiii    +* Re: VMS3Richard Kettlewell
22 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i`* Re: VMS2The Natural Philosopher
23 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i `- Re: VMS1c186282
22 Jun 25 i     iiiii    +* Re: VMS3rbowman
23 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i`* Re: VMS2candycanearter07
23 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i `- Re: VMS1rbowman
24 Jun 25 i     iiiii    +* Re: VMS49Robert Riches
24 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i+* Re: VMS6rbowman
24 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii`* Re: VMS5rbowman
24 Jun 25 i     iiiii    ii `* Re: VMS4The Natural Philosopher
25 Jun06:36 i     iiiii    ii  `* Re: VMS3c186282
25 Jun07:31 i     iiiii    ii   `* Re: VMS2The Natural Philosopher
25 Jun08:08 i     iiiii    ii    `- Re: VMS1c186282
24 Jun 25 i     iiiii    i+* Re: VMS7Richard Kettlewell
25 Jun04:01 i     iiiii    ii`* Re: VMS6Robert Riches
25 Jun06:59 i     iiiii    ii `* Re: VMS5c186282
25 Jun07:52 i     iiiii    ii  +- Re: VMS1rbowman
25 Jun17:32 i     iiiii    ii  `* Re: VMS3John Ames
25 Jun17:44 i     iiiii    ii   `* Re: VMS2John Ames
26 Jun00:01 i     iiiii    ii    `- Re: VMS1c186282
27 Jun07:00 i     iiiii    i`* Re: VMS35candycanearter07
27 Jun08:37 i     iiiii    i `* Re: VMS34Richard Kettlewell
27 Jun08:45 i     iiiii    i  +* Re: VMS4The Natural Philosopher
27 Jun18:27 i     iiiii    i  i`* Re: VMS3c186282
27 Jun19:13 i     iiiii    i  i `* Re: VMS2The Natural Philosopher
28 Jun14:16 i     iiiii    i  i  `- Re: VMS1Chris Ahlstrom
27 Jun18:24 i     iiiii    i  `* Re: VMS29c186282
27 Jun18:40 i     iiiii    i   `* Re: VMS28rbowman
27 Jun19:20 i     iiiii    i    +* Re: VMS4Lew Pitcher
28 Jun00:03 i     iiiii    i    i`* Re: VMS3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Jun06:13 i     iiiii    i    i `* Re: VMS2c186282
28 Jun07:10 i     iiiii    i    i  `- Re: VMS1rbowman
27 Jun23:16 i     iiiii    i    `* Re: VMS23c186282
28 Jun08:52 i     iiiii    i     `* Re: VMS22Richard Kettlewell
29 Jun04:16 i     iiiii    i      `* Re: VMS21c186282
29 Jun08:18 i     iiiii    i       `* Re: VMS20Richard Kettlewell
30 Jun00:09 i     iiiii    i        `* Re: VMS19c186282
30 Jun08:36 i     iiiii    i         +* Re: VMS17The Natural Philosopher
30 Jun08:51 i     iiiii    i         i+* Re: VMS11Richard Kettlewell
30 Jun08:59 i     iiiii    i         ii+* Re: VMS3The Natural Philosopher
30 Jun09:33 i     iiiii    i         iii`* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Jun17:08 i     iiiii    i         iii `- Re: VMS1John Ames
30 Jun09:00 i     iiiii    i         ii+* Re: VMS4Richard Kettlewell
30 Jun09:24 i     iiiii    i         iii`* Re: VMS3The Natural Philosopher
30 Jun09:34 i     iiiii    i         iii `* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Jul04:30 i     iiiii    i         iii  `- Re: VMS1c186282
1 Jul04:26 i     iiiii    i         ii`* Re: VMS3c186282
1 Jul10:49 i     iiiii    i         ii `* Re: VMS2The Natural Philosopher
1 Jul13:44 i     iiiii    i         ii  `- Re: VMS1Lew Pitcher
30 Jun08:54 i     iiiii    i         i+* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Jun19:10 i     iiiii    i         ii`- Re: VMS1rbowman
1 Jul04:12 i     iiiii    i         i`* Re: VMS3c186282
1 Jul05:02 i     iiiii    i         i `* Re: VMS2rbowman
1 Jul17:42 i     iiiii    i         i  `- Re: VMS1c186282
30 Jun08:56 i     iiiii    i         `- Re: VMS1Richard Kettlewell
27 Jun20:40 i     iiiii    `- Re: VMS1Rich
20 Jun 25 i     iiii`* Re: VMS5Richard Kettlewell
21 Jun 25 i     iiii +* Re: VMS2Rich
21 Jun 25 i     iiii i`- Re: VMS1Richard Kettlewell
21 Jun 25 i     iiii `* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Jun 25 i     iiii  `- Re: VMS1c186282
21 Jun 25 i     iii`- Re: VMS1c186282
21 Jun 25 i     ii`* Re: VMS2c186282
21 Jun 25 i     ii `- Re: VMS1rbowman
20 Jun 25 i     i+* Re: VMS6The Natural Philosopher
20 Jun 25 i     ii+- Re: VMS1Rich
21 Jun 25 i     ii+* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Jun 25 i     ii`* Re: VMS2Richard Kettlewell
20 Jun 25 i     i`* Re: VMS2Rich
20 Jun 25 i     `* Re: VMS2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Jun 25 `* Re: VMS8Rich

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal