Sujet : Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating
De : nuh-uh (at) *nospam* nope.com (Alan)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.mobile.ipad comp.sys.mac.advocacyDate : 11. Jun 2025, 18:00:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <102ccnk$23do4$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2025-06-11 09:24, Marion wrote:
Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating
which isn't a bad thing - it just proves that Apple can't innovate.
*Apple sherlocked these apps at WWDC 2025*
<https://www.macrumors.com/2025/06/11/apple-sherlocked-these-apps-at-wwdc-2025/>
MacRumors specifically talks about how Apple sherlocked several apps at
WWDC 2025 by introducing new features in iOS 26 and macOS Tahoe that offer
similar functionality to existing third-party solutions. Examples mentioned
include enhanced Spotlight replacing features of Raycast and Launch Bar,
Call Assist acting like Robokiller and Truecaller, and Notes app for Apple
Watch replacing various third-party note-taking apps on the watch.
I repeat that it's not necessarily a bad thing when Apple developers are
forced to copy existing functionality because htey can't innovate, but it
does provide more evidence that Apple long ago lost the ability to
innovate.
All Apple can do now to "innovate" is remove basic functionality so that
the poor Apple customer is forced to figure out a way to buy it back.
Oh, and Apple usually innovates a half dozen "exciting new emojis" too!
Subsuming functionality that exists in third party apps isn't necessarily "sherlocking" them.
Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating
Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating