Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sm advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating
De : thomas.e.elam (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Tom Elam)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.mobile.ipad comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date : 14. Jun 2025, 01:21:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <102if9g$3orf4$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/11/2025 6:48 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-06-11 15:46, Tom Elam wrote:
On 6/11/2025 1:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-06-11 09:24, Marion wrote:
Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating
which isn't a bad thing - it just proves that Apple can't innovate.
>
  *Apple sherlocked these apps at WWDC 2025*
  <https://www.macrumors.com/2025/06/11/apple-sherlocked-these-apps- at-wwdc-2025/>
>
MacRumors specifically talks about how Apple sherlocked several apps at
WWDC 2025 by introducing new features in iOS 26 and macOS Tahoe that offer
similar functionality to existing third-party solutions. Examples mentioned
include enhanced Spotlight replacing features of Raycast and Launch Bar,
Call Assist acting like Robokiller and Truecaller, and Notes app for Apple
Watch replacing various third-party note-taking apps on the watch.
>
I repeat that it's not necessarily a bad thing when Apple developers are
forced to copy existing functionality because htey can't innovate, but it
does provide more evidence that Apple long ago lost the ability to
innovate.
>
All Apple can do now to "innovate" is remove basic functionality so that
the poor Apple customer is forced to figure out a way to buy it back.
>
Oh, and Apple usually innovates a half dozen "exciting new emojis" too!
>
Subsuming functionality that exists in third party apps isn't necessarily "sherlocking" them.
>
Alan, Apple has been taking ideas from other companies, improving them, and making noise about their "innovation" for decades. Of course, same is true of Google!
 I never said that they hadn't, asshole.
 Learn to read.
You have denied that Apple copies others since the went to larger phones since, well, Apple introduced a plus-size phone. At the time you stated Apple was just "following consumer trends" when larger Android phones had been out for years?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Jun 25 * Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating27Marion
11 Jun 25 `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating26Alan
11 Jun 25  `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating25Tom Elam
11 Jun 25   +* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating3Alan
14 Jun 25   i`* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating2Tom Elam
14 Jun 25   i `- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
12 Jun 25   `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating21Your Name
12 Jun 25    `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating20Chris
12 Jun 25     `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating19Tyrone
12 Jun 25      +* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating5Jolly Roger
12 Jun 25      i`* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating4Tyrone
12 Jun 25      i +- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
12 Jun 25      i `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating2Your Name
12 Jun 25      i  `- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
12 Jun 25      +- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
12 Jun 25      `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating12Chris
12 Jun 25       +* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating8badgolferman
13 Jun 25       i+- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
13 Jun 25       i`* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating6Chris
13 Jun 25       i `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating5badgolferman
13 Jun 25       i  `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating4Alan
19 Jun 25       i   `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating3Tom Elam
19 Jun 25       i    `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating2badgolferman
19 Jun 25       i     `- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
13 Jun 25       `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating3candycanearter07
14 Jun 25        `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating2Chris
14 Jun 25         `- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal