Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown

On 2024-09-28, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2024-09-27 20:20, Andrew wrote:

<https://9to5mac.com/2024/09/27/ifixit-iphone-16-pro-teardown-new-
battery-camera-control-compromise-much-more-repairable/>
 
Apple is still the only one using such laughably puny el cheapo batteries,
but they're encased in metal now, and they removed the 5G mmWave antennae
to create space for the Camera Control button (which iFixit considered a
fair loss of the 5G antenna traded for the gain of the camera button).

>
Apple's batteries seem to work fine...
>
'The middle child of this year’s iPhones, the iPhone 16 Pro lasted 14
hours and 7 minutes on a single charge.'
>
<https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/iphones/iphone-16-battery-life-results-are-in-and-we-can-hardly-believe-our-eyes#section-iphone-16-pro-battery-life>
>
How many phones best that life in their testing?
>
<https://www.tomsguide.com/us/smartphones-best-battery-life,review-2857.html>
>
Not many.
>
:-)

Huh... Only a dozen non-Apple phones outlast Apple's "laughably puny el
cheapo battery" in the iPhone 16 Pro? But we've been told over and over
by Arlen and his little anti-Apple trollboi gang of losers that Apple's
batteries are complete shit! How can this be?

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR