Very OT meant for Hugh H - Roth or no-Roth

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sm advocacy 
Sujet : Very OT meant for Hugh H - Roth or no-Roth
De : thomas.e.elam (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Tom Elam)
Groupes : comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date : 08. Dec 2024, 15:37:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vj4b01$3rdd7$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
I have spent some quality time looking at Roth conversions. Wow, that gets complicated in a hurry. Bottom line is it's not at all clear that there are benefits for me. So much depends on assumptions and goals. You would need to do a complex probabilistic Monte Carlo analysis including tax policy changes, longevity, market returns, and more. Plus, your goals key. For me it comes down to wanting to leave my estate to charitable entities and some family members, doing so with as little tax liability for them as possible. I am doing something different from Roth, reinvesting RMD and other investment income into income-producing assets. 60% was put back this year, not spent. Amazing how fast that compounds into even more income.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Dec 24 * Very OT meant for Hugh H - Roth or no-Roth10Tom Elam
8 Dec 24 `* Re: Very OT meant for Hugh H - Roth or no-Roth9-hh
9 Dec 24  `* Re: Very OT meant for Hugh H - Roth or no-Roth8Tom Elam
10 Dec 24   `* Re: Very OT meant for Hugh H - Roth or no-Roth7-hh
13 Dec 24    `* Re: Very OT meant for Hugh H - Roth or no-Roth6Tom Elam
13 Dec 24     `* Re: Very OT meant for Hugh H - Roth or no-Roth5-hh
19 Dec 24      +* Re: Very OT meant for Hugh H - Roth or no-Roth3Tom Elam
19 Dec 24      i`* Re: Very OT meant for Hugh H - Roth or no-Roth2-hh
24 Dec 24      i `- Re: Very OT meant for Hugh H - Roth or no-Roth1Tom Elam
19 Dec 24      `- Re: Very OT meant for Hugh H - Roth or no-Roth1Tom Elam

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal