Liste des Groupes | Revenir à sm advocacy |
On 12/23/24 7:20 PM, Tom Elam wrote the first of four posts (merged herein):Incredible how you can find a cloud in any silver lining!On 12/23/2024 4:23 PM, -hh wrote:Odd how with four replies, Tommy missed the first point.On 12/23/24 9:12 AM, Tom Elam wrote:On 12/21/2024 4:10 PM, Alan wrote:>...>
Are you still whining, Liarboy?
>
And I'm not 67.
I'll check my numbers. Left Malvern Collegiate Institute (grade 9-12 high school) in 1980, likely at age 18 unless you failed a grade or two. Highly unlikely you ever skipped a grade. 1980-18=1962. 2024-1962=62, or so. Could be 63, depending on details. Closer?
>
https://schoolweb.tdsb.on.ca/malvernci/About-Us
>
I'll amend my remark.
>
"Bottom line? No wonder 62-ish year old not-retired ...
Interesting dig attempt from one who worked for more than a decade longer: just how old were you when you finally hung it up? 75? 76?
>Very unlikely he can afford much of an upgrade.">
Interesting dig attempt from one who definitely knows that one of his hobbies is running a dedicated race car (or two).
Minor details to the point which was that your out of pocket expense was essentially zero, making the hobby be quite cheap....>
In the borrowed CAP again, most likely.
...
Seems like someone forgot about skiing as another pastime. /s
>
I don't borrow CAP aircraft. I am privileged to fly missions authorized and funded by USAF. Today it was demo flights for 2 high school students with aviation career interests. That is most of my flying these days.
I don't think Alan has mentioned skiing in a long time...So? When did Absence of Evidence flip to become Evidence of Absence?
-----
> Forgot, I was already pretty well off in 2002. But the opportunity
> to make $200-300 an hour and be my own boss was very tempting.
Quite an interesting spin on that history, because from the 2016 archives:
[quote]
TE> By 55, 2001, 22 years later, I was at $2.5 million....
HH> And by 56, it dropped to $1M as your life choices caught up with you.
[/quote]
> ... I was very much part-time, and were were able to travel
> on our schedule and I was able to pursue my flying avocation.
> The 401k that came out of that has enabled a VERY comfortable
> retirement.
Of course consulting can be more schedule-flexible by its nature, although fewer hours needs to be queried if that's by hours booked, or actually worked, since Tommy has said that he typically worked more hours than he booked. Finally, 'comfortable' is made easier when one defers for a decade later than average retirement age.
> My last major project started in late 2018, but took to 2020 once it started.
But the question was when you retired: that statement only makes it clear that as of 2020 (age 72+2=74), you were still taking on new work.
> I have not accepted another since, and several were offered.
> In 2018 I turned 72 and the RMD money started to flow in. It
> was always my intention to scale way back once the 401K kicked in.
> As I stated were a now VERY comfortable, even to the point of
> re-investing considerable RMD and investment earnings. It's
> been a great ride.
Yet envision having as good of a ride while retiring ten years younger. Something along those lines is still a possibility for Alan, et al.
-----
> Oh, and by the way, if you want to fly a CAP airplane on a mission
> not USAF-assigned you can rent one for a few hours...CAP 182 is
> currently about $150/hour compared to $178 for the club 182 I rented
> last week.
So instead of free, a mere 15% discount for local joyriding.
-----
> And one more point. By working into my 70's I was not in
> the denominator of the dependency ratio for ...
So what? Individual decisions like this invariably are self-serving, so its not like you were being highly altruistic and didn't claim SS to avoid being a burden on society, particularly in light of your 'VERY comfortable' 401k, as you you were quite aggressive in maxing that out, which served to lower your reportable income & lowered SS taxes paid.
> ... and extra 15 years or so after I retired from my full time job.
An 'extra' interesting euphemism for being caught in an office purge in your 50s, and losing more than half of your net worth in a divorce.
> One solution to dependency ratio declines is to increase retirement
> age for more of us.
Pretty much the worst solution, as non-whitecollar workers pay with their bodies and have difficulties getting even to age 62 without deliberating injuries & loss of income. Consider instead liberalizing immigration policy and providing affordable childcare, as both are less injurious & expand in the younger prime working age (25-55) workforce.
-hh
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.