Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sm advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating
De : jollyroger (at) *nospam* pobox.com (Jolly Roger)
Groupes : comp.mobile.ipad comp.sys.mac.advocacy misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Date : 12. Jun 2025, 15:05:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Message-ID : <mb054nFj92qU2@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
On 2025-06-12, Tyrone <none@none.none> wrote:
On Jun 12, 2025 at 8:34:24 AM EDT, "Chris" <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2025-06-11 22:46:24 +0000, Tom Elam said:
On 6/11/2025 1:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-06-11 09:24, Marion wrote:
Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of
innovating which isn't a bad thing - it just proves that Apple can't
innovate.
 
  *Apple sherlocked these apps at WWDC 2025*
 
<https://www.macrumors.com/2025/06/11/apple-sherlocked-these-apps-at-wwdc-2025/>
 
MacRumors specifically talks about how Apple sherlocked several apps at
WWDC 2025 by introducing new features in iOS 26 and macOS Tahoe that offer
similar functionality to existing third-party solutions. Examples
mentioned include enhanced Spotlight replacing features of Raycast and
Launch Bar, Call Assist acting like Robokiller and Truecaller, and
Notes app for Apple Watch replacing various third-party note-taking
apps on the watch.
 
I repeat that it's not necessarily a bad thing when Apple developers are
forced to copy existing functionality because htey can't innovate, but it
does provide more evidence that Apple long ago lost the ability to
innovate.
 
All Apple can do now to "innovate" is remove basic functionality so that
the poor Apple customer is forced to figure out a way to buy it back.
 
Oh, and Apple usually innovates a half dozen "exciting new emojis" too!
 
Subsuming functionality that exists in third party apps isn't
necessarily "sherlocking" them.
 
Alan, Apple has been taking ideas from other companies, improving them,
and making noise about their "innovation" for decades. Of course, same
is true of Google!
 
Bill Gates / Microsoft didn't even write DOS either. They bought it
from a real developer named Tim Patterson.
 
And stole the idea of Windows from ..
 
.. Apple!
>
And Apple stole it from Xerox.

Apple didn't steal anything from Xerox, fool.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Jun 25 * Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating27Marion
11 Jun 25 `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating26Alan
11 Jun 25  `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating25Tom Elam
11 Jun 25   +* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating3Alan
14 Jun 25   i`* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating2Tom Elam
14 Jun 25   i `- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
12 Jun 25   `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating21Your Name
12 Jun 25    `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating20Chris
12 Jun 25     `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating19Tyrone
12 Jun 25      +* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating5Jolly Roger
12 Jun 25      i`* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating4Tyrone
12 Jun 25      i +- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
12 Jun 25      i `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating2Your Name
12 Jun 25      i  `- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
12 Jun 25      +- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
12 Jun 25      `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating12Chris
12 Jun 25       +* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating8badgolferman
13 Jun 25       i+- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
13 Jun 25       i`* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating6Chris
13 Jun 25       i `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating5badgolferman
13 Jun 25       i  `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating4Alan
19 Jun 25       i   `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating3Tom Elam
19 Jun 25       i    `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating2badgolferman
19 Jun 25       i     `- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
13 Jun 25       `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating3candycanearter07
14 Jun 25        `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating2Chris
14 Jun 25         `- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal