Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sm advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating
De : nuh-uh (at) *nospam* nope.com (Alan)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.mobile.ipad comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date : 13. Jun 2025, 02:16:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <102fu5d$30r7v$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2025-06-12 13:27, badgolferman wrote:
Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
Tyrone <none@none.none> wrote:
On Jun 12, 2025 at 8:34:24 AM EDT, "Chris" <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2025-06-11 22:46:24 +0000, Tom Elam said:
On 6/11/2025 1:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-06-11 09:24, Marion wrote:
Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of
innovating which isn't a bad thing - it just proves that Apple can't
innovate.
>
*Apple sherlocked these apps at WWDC 2025*
>
<https://www.macrumors.com/2025/06/11/apple-sherlocked-these-apps-at-wwdc-2025/>
>
MacRumors specifically talks about how Apple sherlocked several apps at
WWDC 2025 by introducing new features in iOS 26 and macOS Tahoe that offer
similar functionality to existing third-party solutions. Examples
mentioned include enhanced Spotlight replacing features of Raycast and
Launch Bar, Call Assist acting like Robokiller and Truecaller, and
Notes app for Apple Watch replacing various third-party note-taking
apps on the watch.
>
I repeat that it's not necessarily a bad thing when Apple developers are
forced to copy existing functionality because htey can't innovate, but it
does provide more evidence that Apple long ago lost the ability to
innovate.
>
All Apple can do now to "innovate" is remove basic functionality so that
the poor Apple customer is forced to figure out a way to buy it back.
>
Oh, and Apple usually innovates a half dozen "exciting new emojis" too!
>
Subsuming functionality that exists in third party apps isn't
necessarily "sherlocking" them.
>
Alan, Apple has been taking ideas from other companies, improving them,
and making noise about their "innovation" for decades. Of course, same
is true of Google!
>
Bill Gates / Microsoft didn't even write DOS either. They bought it
from a real developer named Tim Patterson.
>
And stole the idea of Windows from ..
>
.. Apple!
>
And Apple stole it from Xerox.
>
>
And Xerox just copies, well, everything...
>
>
  This is what matters.
 https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/desktop/worldwide/ Desktop
Operating System Market Share Worldwide | Statcounter Global Stats
 Businesses and people who create useful things know what really works.
 
Businesses know what's cheaper in the short term.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Jun 25 * Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating27Marion
11 Jun 25 `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating26Alan
11 Jun 25  `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating25Tom Elam
11 Jun 25   +* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating3Alan
14 Jun 25   i`* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating2Tom Elam
14 Jun 25   i `- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
12 Jun 25   `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating21Your Name
12 Jun 25    `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating20Chris
12 Jun 25     `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating19Tyrone
12 Jun 25      +* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating5Jolly Roger
12 Jun 25      i`* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating4Tyrone
12 Jun 25      i +- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
12 Jun 25      i `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating2Your Name
12 Jun 25      i  `- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
12 Jun 25      +- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
12 Jun 25      `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating12Chris
12 Jun 25       +* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating8badgolferman
13 Jun 25       i+- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
13 Jun 25       i`* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating6Chris
13 Jun 25       i `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating5badgolferman
13 Jun 25       i  `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating4Alan
19 Jun 25       i   `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating3Tom Elam
19 Jun 25       i    `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating2badgolferman
19 Jun 25       i     `- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan
13 Jun 25       `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating3candycanearter07
14 Jun 25        `* Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating2Chris
14 Jun 25         `- Re: Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionali - copying - instead of innovating1Alan

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal